2014
DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2014.22.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk perception in women with high-risk pregnancies

Abstract: Risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies affects the decisions they make about antenatal care and so may therefore influence the wellbeing of mother and baby. This article addresses the factors which influence women when making risk assessments and how these assessments may differ from those of healthcare professionals.Women use multiple sources of information to determine their risk status including advice from professionals, from other trusted sources, and their own intuitive knowledge. They recog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, women's knowledge sources on risk were their own experiences of risk, immediate family members and relatives' stories, and health workers' advice. Women use multiple sources of information to determine their risk status [4,30]. They weigh risk information obtained from various sources [10,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, women's knowledge sources on risk were their own experiences of risk, immediate family members and relatives' stories, and health workers' advice. Women use multiple sources of information to determine their risk status [4,30]. They weigh risk information obtained from various sources [10,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, risk perception is defined as a person's expectancy about the probability of an event [2]. Risk perception affects people's health behavior and healthcare decisions [3][4][5]. People in many situations perceived themselves at lesser risk than average others [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…,Darbyshire et al (2003),Stahl & Hundley (2003),Lindgren et al (2006),Jordan & Murphy (2009), GeorgssonOhman et al (2009),MacKenzie Bryers & van Teijlingen (2010),Lindgren et al (2010),Keely et al (2011), Scamell andAlaszewski (2012), AbedSaeedi et al (2013),Hanghøj (2013),Lee (2014),Mitchell and McClean (2014) NursingCorbin (1987),Searle (1996),Hatmaker and Kemp (1998), Gupton et al (2001), Heaman et al (2004), Castrucci et al (2006), Heyman et al (2006), Carolan (2009), Heaman and Gupton (2009), Yoshino et al (2008), Bayrampour et al (2012a,b), Brooten et al (2012), Hall et al (2012), Jones et al (2012), Bayrampour et al (2013), Rothman (2014) Pharmacy Pole et al (2000), Bonari et al (2005), Nordeng et al (2010),Ojieabu et al (2011), Widnes et al (2012), Widnes et al (2013), Lupattelli et al (2014) Medicine Koren et al (1989, 1992), Enkin (1994), Papiernik et al (1997), Kim et al (2007), Chuang et al (2008), Dearborn et al (2010), Sakaguchi et al (2011), Dellicour et al (2013), Darak et al (2014), Eley et al (2014), Pons Eda et al (2014) Genetics Evans et al (1993), Barnoy et al (2009), Czerwinski et al (2010), Farrell et al (2011), Fausett et al (2014) Bioethics Lyerly et al (2007), Regan and McElroy (2013) Public health Viisainen (2000), Ortendahl and Nasman (2007), Tucker Edmonds et al (2011), Leppo (2012), Lai et al (2013), Hammer and Inglin (2014) Sociology Ettorre (2002), Lupton (2012), Hallgrimsdottir & Benner (2013) Anthropology McClain (1983), Atkinson and Farias (1995) Psychology Perry et al (2003), White et al (2008), Robinson et al (2011), Lee et al (2012, 2014) Psychiatry Walfisch et al (2011) Nutrition and dietary science Morrison et al (2010)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%