2019
DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1647602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk perceptions and the maintenance of environmental injustice in Appalachia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although nearly half of respondents reported having a familial affiliation with the mining industry, mining-related employment opportunities in the study area are limited [ 27 ]. Studies where an affiliation with a polluting industry has influenced behavioral intentions have been conducted in areas where the industry plays a more influential economic role than is currently the case in the study area (e.g., [ 42 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although nearly half of respondents reported having a familial affiliation with the mining industry, mining-related employment opportunities in the study area are limited [ 27 ]. Studies where an affiliation with a polluting industry has influenced behavioral intentions have been conducted in areas where the industry plays a more influential economic role than is currently the case in the study area (e.g., [ 42 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender may influence behavior because women and children are more vulnerable to negative health outcomes from Pb exposure and might be more likely to practice health behaviors [40,41]. Affiliation with mining is likely relevant because several previous studies have linked involvement in livelihoods related to a polluting industry with lower perceived health risk [42,43].…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Appalachian region and coal country around the continent, maintenance of the white supremacist, patriarchal gender structure is dependent on a human‐exemptionalism approach to the land, where coal is extracted at great cost to human—particularly nonwhite—and ecosystem health but persists as a culturally‐respected, white masculine practice (Bell et al., 2019; Feng, 2020; Kojola, 2019; Lewin, 2019; Thompson, 2019). In fact, the risk perception can be low among white residents living near coal impoundments—whose homes have been and could be destroyed from impoundment failure—as a result of the industry's cultural prominence (Greenberg, 2020). Cultural trust in extractive industries, fueled by faith in economic beneficence to a community, is found to be a central reason for low risk perception and lack of reflexivity about the implication of extractive industries in social and ecological disasters (Milnes & Haney, 2017; Stoddart & Quinn Burt, 2020).…”
Section: The White Supremacist Patriarchy Reinforces Human Exemptiona...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender may influence behavior because women and children are more vulnerable to negative health outcomes from Pb exposure and might be more likely to practice health behaviors [47,48]. Affiliation with mining is likely relevant because several previous studies have linked involvement in livelihoods related to a polluting industry with lower perceived health risk [49,50].…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While nearly half of respondents reported having a familial affiliation with the mining industry, mining-related employment opportunities in the Silver Valley are limited. Studies where an affiliation with a polluting industry has influenced behavioral intentions have been conducted in areas where the polluting industry plays a more influential economic role than is currently the case in the Silver Valley (e.g., [49]).…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristics and Behavioral Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%