2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2196033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Preferences and Demand Drivers of Extended Warranties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, both loss aversion and probability weighting can help explain the purchase of insurance against modest risks such as warranties (Rabin and Thaler, ; Cutler and Zeckhauser, 2004; Michel, ), and empirical evidence has been found in support of these approaches (Jindahl, ). Nevertheless, there is also empirical evidence calling into question whether this can be the whole story.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, both loss aversion and probability weighting can help explain the purchase of insurance against modest risks such as warranties (Rabin and Thaler, ; Cutler and Zeckhauser, 2004; Michel, ), and empirical evidence has been found in support of these approaches (Jindahl, ). Nevertheless, there is also empirical evidence calling into question whether this can be the whole story.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study complements this literature by highlighting the potential role of subjective return probability, the third behavioral piece in Prospect Theory. As a result, it is important for future behavioral studies to take a holistic view, similar to the approach in Jindal (2014), for studying how subjective probability, loss aversion, and reference dependence together affect consumer return policy preference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an innovative survey design is used to attenuate possible belief-based biases: respondents choose products and warranties under given failure probabilities. Jindal (2015) shows in simulations (based on the estimated models) that not accounting for risk aversion, loss aversion, and nonlinear probability weighting leads to roughly 16-20% lower optimal prices and, consequently, reduced profits for manufacturers.…”
Section: Product and Non-standard Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%