Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Criminal Justice 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-44133-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk, Regulation and the Reintegration of Sexual Offenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been recognition in recent years that public protection work regarding those with sexual offence convictions, and the risk management processes that dominate this, have focused on restriction, sometimes to the detriment of achieving longer term resettlement outcomes (for example see Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2010). In response, potential avenues to guide the rebalancing of rehabilitative and restriction processes have been suggested including drawing on a desistance approach (Weaver, 2014) and learning from the emerging evidence base about circles of support and accountability (McAlinden, 2006(McAlinden, , 2009.…”
Section: Poor Resettlement Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been recognition in recent years that public protection work regarding those with sexual offence convictions, and the risk management processes that dominate this, have focused on restriction, sometimes to the detriment of achieving longer term resettlement outcomes (for example see Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2010). In response, potential avenues to guide the rebalancing of rehabilitative and restriction processes have been suggested including drawing on a desistance approach (Weaver, 2014) and learning from the emerging evidence base about circles of support and accountability (McAlinden, 2006(McAlinden, , 2009.…”
Section: Poor Resettlement Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popularized in the 1990s and often viewed as a progressive alternative to retribution, restoration emphasizes the achievement of justice through reconciliation between offenders, victims, and often the community, rather than focusing solely on punishment [116-120]. Restorative justice addresses the individual needs of and engages both offenders, holding them accountable, preventing their recidivism through reintegration and rehabilitation, and helping them fully acknowledge and appreciate the consequences of their committed actions, and victims, empowering them to confront the offender, vocalize the effects of the committed actions, and realize justice on their own terms [119, 120]. …”
Section: Implications For the Objectives Of Criminal Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, restorative practices for sex offenders are very limited, as those who do support restorative justice strategies are not sure if its use should be extended to violent or serious crimes, such as sexual offending [132]. Many fear it may belittle the magnitude of sex crimes, particularly against children, and may fail to properly hold offenders accountable [119]. Yet a few restorative justice programs for sex offenders do exist in the United Kingdom, Canada and the U.S. One example is “Circles of Support and Accountability,” a program that targets high risk sex offenders being released from prison and establishes a dialogue of treatment and support between the offender and the community in which the offender is being released [133-136].…”
Section: Implications For the Objectives Of Criminal Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These factors can combine to isolate potential victims from their peers. This isolation has been identified as a key part of the grooming process (Craven et al 2006, Mcalinden 2006. Mrs A had been abused by a family member from the age of three until her teens (SSAB 2014:53).…”
Section: Introduction To the Scrmentioning
confidence: 99%