Abstract:This study was designed to validate and to compare accuracy of the prognostic scores; mainly Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP), creatinine-modified Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP-Cr), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), albumin bilirubin score (ALBI), and AIMS65, for the predicting clinical outcomes in cirrhotic Egyptian patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding (AVB). Retrospective single center study involving 725 patients presenting with AVB due to liver cirrhosis and HCV infection either alone or mixed with… Show more
“…The rate of HI/shock ranged between 1.2% and 68.3% of the eligible studies. The source of bleeding was UGIB in 54 of the included studies, [8][9][10][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]36,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49][50][52][53][54][55][58][59][60][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,38,46,51,57,61,62 One study detailed a population including both UGIB and LGIB patients. 56 In terms of outcomes, 44 studies reported mortality, [8][9][10]18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37]39,[41][42][43][47][48][49][52][53][54][55]58,[63][64][65][66][68][69][70][71][73][74][75] 27 rebleeding,…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
Background: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a life-threatening event. Around 20–30% of patients with GIB will develop hemodynamic instability (HI). Objectives: We aimed to quantify HI as a risk factor for the development of relevant end points in acute GIB. Design: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases in October 2021. Data sources and methods: Studies of GIB patients detailing HI as a risk factor for the investigated outcomes were selected. For the overall results, pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on a random-effects model. Subgroups were formed based on the source of bleeding. The Quality of Prognostic Studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: A total of 62 studies were eligible, and 39 were included in the quantitative synthesis. HI was found to be a risk factor for both in-hospital (OR: 5.48; CI: 3.99–7.52) and 30-day mortality (OR: 3.99; CI: 3.08–5.17) in upper GIB (UGIB). HI was also associated with higher in-hospital (OR: 3.68; CI: 2.24–6.05) and 30-day rebleeding rates (OR: 4.12; 1.83–9.31) among patients with UGIB. The need for surgery was also more frequent in hemodynamically compromised UGIB patients (OR: 3.65; CI: 2.84–4.68). In the case of in-hospital mortality, the risk of bias was high for 1 (4%), medium for 13 (48%), and low for 13 (48%) of the 27 included studies. Conclusion: Hemodynamically compromised patients have increased odds of all relevant untoward end points in GIB. Therefore, to improve the outcomes, adequate emergency care is crucial in HI. Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021285727.
“…The main limitation of prognostic scores in variceal bleeding may be the fact that only a few of them (AIM65, ABC) are correlated to the severity of the liver failure. Some improved CPT variants including creatinine level were also proposed in order to increase accuracy [ 23 ].…”
(1) Background: The assessment of mortality and rebleeding rate in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is essential, and several prognostic scores have been proposed. Some patients with UGIB did not undergo endoscopy, either because they refused the procedure, suffered from alcohol withdrawal symptoms or altered general status, or because the bleeding was severe enough to cause death before the endoscopy. The mortality risk in the subgroup of patients without endoscopy is poorly evaluated in the literature. (2) Methods: The purpose of the study was to identify the most useful scores for the assessment of in-hospital mortality in patients with UGIB with no endoscopy performed and no known etiology. A total of 198 patients with UGIB and no endoscopy performed were admitted between January 2017 and December 2021 and the accuracy of 12 prognostic scores and the Charlson comorbidity index for in-hospital mortality prediction were analyzed, as well as Child–Pugh Turcotte (CPT) and Meld scores in patients with cirrhosis. (3) Results: The mortality rate was 37.9%, higher than in variceal (21.9%, p < 0.0001) and non-variceal bleeding (7.4%, p < 0.0001). The most accurate scores by AUC were the International Bleeding score (INBS, 0.844), Glasgow Blatchford (0.783), MAP score (0.78), Iino (0.766), AIM65 and modified N-score (0.745 each), modified Glasgow-Blatchford (0.73), H3B2 and N-score (0.701); Rockall, Baylor, and T-score had an AUC below 0.7. MELD score was superior to CPT in patients with cirrhosis (AUC 0.811 versus 0.670). (4) Conclusions: The mortality rate in UGIB with no endoscopy was higher than in both variceal and non-variceal bleeding and was higher in the pandemic period but with no statistical significance (45.3% versus 32.14%, p = 0.0586), mainly because of positive cases. Only one case of rebleeding was noted; the hospitalization period was significantly shorter. The most accurate score was International Bleeding Score; the MELD score had a higher but moderate accuracy compared with CPT in patients with cirrhosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.