2013
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk screening of non-native freshwater fishes at the frontier between Asia and Europe: first application in Turkey of the fish invasiveness screening kit

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to assess the invasive potential of introduced non-native and translocated fishes in Turkey (Anatolia and Thrace) by applying the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK), a risk identification tool for freshwater fishes. From independent evaluations by two assessors of 35 species, calibration of FISK for Turkey identified a threshold score of 23, which reliably distinguished between potentially invasive (high risk) and potentially noninvasive (medium to low risk) fishes for Anat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
72
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
72
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mendoza et al (2015) using risk screening tool for freshwater fi shes (Freshwater Invasiveness Screening Kit-FISK; Copp et al 2009) determined a high invasiveness potential for Pterygoplichthys species in Mexico. The same has been estimated for several European countries (Simonović et al 2013, Perdikaris et al 2016 and Turkey (Tarkan et al 2014). In those studies, high risk of invasiveness of this fi sh was associated with its advanced reproductive features, previous history of successful introductions, detrimental impacts to the recipient ecosystems, and its environmental versatility.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Mendoza et al (2015) using risk screening tool for freshwater fi shes (Freshwater Invasiveness Screening Kit-FISK; Copp et al 2009) determined a high invasiveness potential for Pterygoplichthys species in Mexico. The same has been estimated for several European countries (Simonović et al 2013, Perdikaris et al 2016 and Turkey (Tarkan et al 2014). In those studies, high risk of invasiveness of this fi sh was associated with its advanced reproductive features, previous history of successful introductions, detrimental impacts to the recipient ecosystems, and its environmental versatility.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…For the 'Risk of Introduction' section of the "organism" module, African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, was attributed to the highest score, followed by Japanese clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) . Tarkan et al (2014) also assessed the invasive potential of introduced non-native and translocated fishes in Turkey (Anatolia and Thrace) by applying the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK), a risk identification tool for freshwater fishes that C. gariepinus was evaluated as translocated native invasive species with a mean value of calibration score 25.8, high risk species.…”
Section: Distribution In Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AS-ISK and FISK v2 have been used successfully for the screening of non-native and translocated fish species in the freshwater systems (e.g. Tarkan et al, 2014;. Risk screening practices are part of risk assessment systems and used to estimate a potential invader colonizing into a new environment (Daehler et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%