1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199821)43:1<62::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks and advantages in standardization of bores and cones for heads in modular hip prostheses

Abstract: Standardization of bores and cones for modular hip prosthesis heads has been addressed by both the International Standard Organisation (ISO) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in response to the need to control the conditions of head-trunnion fit that thereby improves implant safety. Standardization of these conditions could help the surgeon avoid fit mismatch, especially during revision surgery. Instituting a system of standardization without taking all critical parameters into consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More brittle materials, such as ceramics, are more susceptible to fracture than metal components. The fracture risk of ceramics is greatly increased by the taper contact region, caused by the type of mismatch or taper offset, the taper roughness, and the taper straightness (Heimke 1994;Cales and Stefani 1998). A 'base fit' taper mismatch increases the risk of ceramic head fracture, therefore a 'tip fit' is advised in order to reduce the risk of ceramic fracture (Piconi and Maccauro 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More brittle materials, such as ceramics, are more susceptible to fracture than metal components. The fracture risk of ceramics is greatly increased by the taper contact region, caused by the type of mismatch or taper offset, the taper roughness, and the taper straightness (Heimke 1994;Cales and Stefani 1998). A 'base fit' taper mismatch increases the risk of ceramic head fracture, therefore a 'tip fit' is advised in order to reduce the risk of ceramic fracture (Piconi and Maccauro 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is assumed that the taper will engage at this location, it is not known where the taper will engage after surgical impaction, due to manufacturing tolerances which lead to variability. The original design of tapers using ceramic heads was implemented for proximal contact to prevent large tensile stresses thereby reducing the risk of head fracture . However, metal taper junctions can be designed to engage distally .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient had 32-mm CrCo femoral heads on a titanium stem with a 12/14 taper on bilateral hips, both with Trilogy acetabular components and an M/L taper standard stem (right) and extended offset (left) (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN). The design of the trunnion itself may contribute to the development of MACC [22], [23]. The base of shorter trunnions lies within the taper of the femoral head, which may increase edge loading and base corrosion [24] and may increase material wear [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%