2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks and pregnancy outcome after fetal reduction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a Danish national retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zemet et al ( 12 ) found in a cohort of 248 fetal reduction cases that those undergoing fetal reduction at 11–14 weeks had lower rates of pregnancy loss (0.6% vs. 1.3%), preterm delivery (pregnancy loss not included) <32 weeks (1.8% vs. 8.0%) and <34 weeks (1.8% vs. 12.0%) than those undergoing fetal reduction at approximately 15–23 weeks, though they found that the GA at delivery was not different from the GA at surgery ( 12 ). Another most recent study of 172 selective reduction cases, Kristensen et al reported that those undergoing surgery before 14 weeks had a lower rate of adverse pregnancy outcome (miscarriage, stillbirth), preterm birth <28 and <32 weeks (pregnancy loss not included), compared with those reduced after 14 weeks (1.4% vs. 6.1%; 0% vs. 4.3%; 2.8% vs. 5.4%, respectively) ( 20 ). The loss rate and preterm delivery rates from the above-mentioned studies were comparable to those in our study; however, the preterm delivery rate in the study of Zemet and Kristensen was lower than the result of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zemet et al ( 12 ) found in a cohort of 248 fetal reduction cases that those undergoing fetal reduction at 11–14 weeks had lower rates of pregnancy loss (0.6% vs. 1.3%), preterm delivery (pregnancy loss not included) <32 weeks (1.8% vs. 8.0%) and <34 weeks (1.8% vs. 12.0%) than those undergoing fetal reduction at approximately 15–23 weeks, though they found that the GA at delivery was not different from the GA at surgery ( 12 ). Another most recent study of 172 selective reduction cases, Kristensen et al reported that those undergoing surgery before 14 weeks had a lower rate of adverse pregnancy outcome (miscarriage, stillbirth), preterm birth <28 and <32 weeks (pregnancy loss not included), compared with those reduced after 14 weeks (1.4% vs. 6.1%; 0% vs. 4.3%; 2.8% vs. 5.4%, respectively) ( 20 ). The loss rate and preterm delivery rates from the above-mentioned studies were comparable to those in our study; however, the preterm delivery rate in the study of Zemet and Kristensen was lower than the result of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kristensen et al in 11 years cohort study about dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies that undergone fetal reduction. They reported that this procedure was safe with good outcome for remaining co-twin and they showed that best results was taken when the procedure performed before 14 weeks they reported 19.4% preterm delivery rate before 37 weeks when reduction was performed at GA >14 weeks and 6.9% when reduction was performed before 14 weeks ( 17 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study noted that asystole could be observed within one to two minutes of KCl injection, with immediate post-procedural complications, including maternal pain, leaking, and bleeding, which was conservatively managed [ 42 ]. Importantly, it is highlighted that potassium supplementation is unlikely to adversely affect the fetus without inducing maternal toxicity [ 43 ]. Furthermore, the application of KCl for fetal reduction is recognized as an effective and safe method for inducing fetal demise [ 25 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%