1996
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.4.0634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks in using siphon-reducing devices in adult patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus: bench test investigations with Delta valves

Abstract: To elucidate the reason for malfunction of Delta valves in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus, the authors applied a new concept of the bench test and simulated intracranial pressure (ICP) to measure the resultant flow with a complete shunt system. Subcutaneous pressure on the valve, valve implantation site, and postural hydrostatic differential-pressure changes were simulated in this bench test designed for adult patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Subcutaneous pressure ranged within 6.4 +/-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure drop over the constriction and the pressure over the hydrocephalus shunt were measured with differential pressure transducers tt. The shunt was mounted on a support and submerged into 65 mm of water (HASSAN, et al, 1996) (corresponding to the tissue pressure). Outflow from the shunt was led into an overflow container with a constant water level at the zero pressure level, or at -3 kPa level when testing the anti-siphoning device with a distal hydrostatic component.…”
Section: In Vitro Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure drop over the constriction and the pressure over the hydrocephalus shunt were measured with differential pressure transducers tt. The shunt was mounted on a support and submerged into 65 mm of water (HASSAN, et al, 1996) (corresponding to the tissue pressure). Outflow from the shunt was led into an overflow container with a constant water level at the zero pressure level, or at -3 kPa level when testing the anti-siphoning device with a distal hydrostatic component.…”
Section: In Vitro Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASD requires precise location, 8,9) whereas the DSV can be implanted anywhere in parallel to the body axis. The present study indicates that the DSV prevents the majority of problems related to overdrainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the antisiphon systems including the ASD, Delta valve, Novus valve and the Integra Referential valve as well as the new Strata valve carry a risk of underdrainage [3,6,10,17,20]. The causes of underdrainage are divided into two categories 1.…”
Section: Antisiphon Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of underdrainage are divided into two categories 1. Overfunction of the device, which is related to the position of the device [6,17,20] 2. Occlusion of device due to increased subcutaneous pressure around the device [3,6] The latter is the fatal disadvantage of the structure of this system.…”
Section: Antisiphon Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%