Risks, Rights, and Needs: Compatible or Contradictory Bases for Social Protection?

Abstract

Justifications for the welfare state in general, and for social protection in particular, have come from three sources: market failures, specifically the inability of commercial and community-based insurance mechanisms to provide cover against all forms of risk; doctrines of human rights, specifically economic and social rights; and needs-based doctrines which stress both the practical and the moral importance for poor and non-poor alike of eliminating (or at least alleviating) poverty. Perhaps because the three arise largely from distinct intellectual traditions, the three discourses tend to run in parallel, with remarkably few intersection points. In public policy debates, moreover, these three discourses tend to come into and fall out of fashion, only to come back again. Given these dynamics, those who support social protection and the goals of poverty reduction would do well to understand each of the three discourses, including the areas where they are mutually supportive and those where they are mutually contradictory. This paper explores those areas of mutual support and contradiction.

Risks and Vulnerabilities of Children in Zambia: Mooting Responsive Social Protection Interventions

“…In different contexts social protection evokes a myriad of definitions ranging from response to contingencies, including providing assistance to meet basic needs (Devereux & Sabates-Wheeler, 2007;Munro, 2008), effective management of social risks (Barr, 2001(Barr, , 2004World Bank, 2000), and protecting rights (Ellis, Devereux & White, 2009;ILO, 2008;Munro, 2008;UNICEF, 2008;United Nations, 1989;Venter, 2002). For De Haan (2000, cited in Barrientos, Hulme & Shephard, 2005 social protection is the prevention and reduction of poverty as well as provision of support to the poorest.…”

Inclusive Social Protection in Latin America: A Comprehensive, Rights-Based Approach

“…It defines a set of strategies for pinpointing the various sources and types of risk at an early stage, with the aim of risk prevention, mitigation and coping Jorgensen, 1999, Serrano andRaczynski, 2003). Basically, social risk management is designed to ascertain the impact of market imperfections on the risk faced by families (Munro, 2008) and the need to develop public social protection measures to reduce vulnerability, stimulate consumption and promote equity in managing the risk of individuals, households and communities, especially lower-income households (poor and vulnerable). Such mechanisms must be implemented where markets are either deficient or non-existent, and are seen as short-term interventions to aid economic development.…”

Protección social con enfoque de derechos para la América Latina del siglo XXI

“…Esos mecanismos se conciben como intervenciones acotadas en el tiempo. Básicamente, el manejo social del riesgo intenta destacar el impacto de las imperfecciones del mercado en el riesgo que enfrentan las familias (Munro, 2008) y la necesidad de generar medidas públicas de protección social para reducir la vulnerabilidad, activar el consumo y promover la equidad en la gestión de los riesgos de los individuos, hogares y comunidades, especialmente de los más pobres y vulnerables. En años recientes, este organismo ha complementado esta formulación con la necesidad de brindar una protección social eficaz a todos los ciudadanos.…”