2013
DOI: 10.4000/fcs.1260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risque d’estimation, coût du capital et communication des tests de dépréciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, and in line with our expectations and previous results (Li, 2010;Paugam et al, 2013), there is a negative association between firm size and the capital cost. This association can be explained by the fact that large companies are encouraged to disclose more information to the public than the smaller.…”
Section: Ifrs and Cost Of Capitalsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, and in line with our expectations and previous results (Li, 2010;Paugam et al, 2013), there is a negative association between firm size and the capital cost. This association can be explained by the fact that large companies are encouraged to disclose more information to the public than the smaller.…”
Section: Ifrs and Cost Of Capitalsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For French listed firms, disclosures with regard to impairment‐testing vary greatly from one firm to another (see Paugam et al., ). For instance, the pharmaceutical company Stallergenes, in its 2006 annual report's ‘main accounting methods’ section, provides only minimal narrative information about impairment‐testing.…”
Section: Impairment‐testing Disclosures and Information Risk: Developmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the relevance, it should be noted that the IASB itself identifies inconsistencies motivated by a lack of specific guidance in some of the IAS/IFRS that may lead to different levels of disclosure (IASB, 2019). Through the literature, it is also possible to see that the level of disclosures is different according to the standards under analysis, either in Portugal (Kasyan et al, 2018) or in other markets (Alkababji, 2016;Fahad et al, 2020;Glaum et al,2013;Paugam et al, 2013). Such divergences can be potentially explained by the different methodologies, periods, and samples used, but also by the different materials involved.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the existence of research that covers a given (or some) standard, covering different assets and liabilities that can be measured at a current value under several IAS and IFRS [namely on IFRS 13 (Alkababji, 2016;Kasyan et al, 2018), IAS 19 (Ali et al, 2004;Fahad et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2014;Street & Gray, 2002;Tsalavoutas, 2011), IAS 36 (Glaum et al 2013;Paugam et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2014;Tsalavoutas, 2011), and IAS 37 (Santos et al, 2014;Tsalavoutas, 2011)], none studies were identified that assess disclosures related to discount rate in a broader perspective. Thus, this study contributes in this regard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation