My point of departure is the intersection of three heavily traveled conceptual highways that wind across American anthropology. The first is ritual healing, which has preoccupied anthropology as religion, performance, therapy, and, broadly speaking, as cultural process (Csordas and Kleinman 1996;Dow 1986;Kleinman 1980;Levi-Strauss 1966). The second is identity politics-that is, the deployment of representation and mobilization of community within plural societies in the name of gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, race, or religion-which in recent years, has captured the attention of scholars in both cultural anthropology and interdisciplinary cultural studies (Calhoun 1994;Friedman 1992;Giddens 1990; Lash and Friedman 1992). The third is Navajo society, which remains one of the most heavily documented, most frequently plundered for ethnographic examples, and most irritated by the persistent probing of anthropologists of all stripes (Farella 1984;Kluckhohn and Leighton 1946;Lamphere 1977;Witherspoon 1977). In this article, I elaborate the relation between ritual healing and identity politics in contemporary Navajo society by presenting a conceptual framework that can potentially be applied across a wider range of societies.What is the purpose of questioning the relation between ritual healing and identity politics? Doing so allows me to address in specific fashion the perennial issue of the relation between religion and politics, both of which are forms of power but with ostensibly different motives and modes of operation (Fogelson and Adams 1977). It allows me to address the parallel issues of the individual in relation to the collective and of microsocial in relation to macrosocial 20 american ethnologist