2017
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rituals Improve Children's Ability to Delay Gratification

Abstract: To be accepted into social groups, individuals must internalize and reproduce appropriate group conventions, such as rituals. The copying of such rigid and socially stipulated behavioral sequences places heavy demands on executive function. Given previous research showing that challenging executive functioning improves it, it was hypothesized that engagement in ritualistic behaviors improves children's executive functioning, in turn improving their ability to delay gratification. A 3-month circle time games in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Designers of programs and curricula should also incorporate rituals and conventions that may promote EFs and culturally appropriate applications of EFs. For example, in young children from Central Europe and Melanesia, ritualized versions of school activities designed to promote EFs yielded more optimal results than instrumental versions of the same activities (Rybanska, McKay, Jong, & Whitehouse, ). The ritualized condition had no specified rationale or goal and activities were introduced as having firm rules and clearly established procedures (e.g., “It has always been done this way”), whereas the instrumental condition included explanations that prompted a goal‐directed rationale for the activities (e.g., “If we do it this way, we will learn”).…”
Section: Interventions For Executive Function Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designers of programs and curricula should also incorporate rituals and conventions that may promote EFs and culturally appropriate applications of EFs. For example, in young children from Central Europe and Melanesia, ritualized versions of school activities designed to promote EFs yielded more optimal results than instrumental versions of the same activities (Rybanska, McKay, Jong, & Whitehouse, ). The ritualized condition had no specified rationale or goal and activities were introduced as having firm rules and clearly established procedures (e.g., “It has always been done this way”), whereas the instrumental condition included explanations that prompted a goal‐directed rationale for the activities (e.g., “If we do it this way, we will learn”).…”
Section: Interventions For Executive Function Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, executive functions are susceptible to change, with interventions successfully improving executive function performance (e.g. after music training: Alemán et al, ; Rituals: Rybanska, Mckay, Jong, & Whitehouse, ) and structured physical activity programmes (Xiong et al, ). However, some differences are also apparent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All but one subject did not elaborate on the reasons behind possessing this trait, which was implicitly described by the subjects as a combination of the ability to delay gratification, intrinsic motivation, and further the ability to break down larger goals into short-term sub-goals. Concerning further research, we notice that examinations of the workings behind delayed gratification have been done extensively, for instance, by Duckworth, Tsukayama, and Kirby [66], Perez-Arce [67], Rybanska et al [68], and Gabaix and Laibson [69]. Having gained qualitative insights with the current work, a consequential step will be to conduct a large-sample, quantitative survey and to provide a formal model including these factors and accounting for mid-to long-term talent planning [70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%