2016
DOI: 10.1177/1476127016630526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rivals’ reactions to mergers and acquisitions

Abstract: Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) research has principally focused on attributes of the acquiring firm and post-acquisition outcomes. To extend our knowledge, we focus on external factors, in particular rival responses, and explore when and how rivals respond to their competitor's acquisitions. Leveraging the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) framework, we predict and find evidence that a rival's dependence on markets in common with the acquirer, resourse similarity between rival and acquirer, and a rival's o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(193 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research could consider mobility in industries that have different roles for professionals and labour market dynamics. For instance, research scientists in the pharmaceutical industry have more specificity with high value non‐human assets, leading to more intense rivalries with competitors and potentially predatory poaching behaviours (Gardner, ; Uhlenbruck et al, ). Alternatively, turnover may benefit both the hiring and exited firms when there is repeated hiring of alumni from collaborating suppliers (Brymer et al, ; Carnahan and Somaya, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could consider mobility in industries that have different roles for professionals and labour market dynamics. For instance, research scientists in the pharmaceutical industry have more specificity with high value non‐human assets, leading to more intense rivalries with competitors and potentially predatory poaching behaviours (Gardner, ; Uhlenbruck et al, ). Alternatively, turnover may benefit both the hiring and exited firms when there is repeated hiring of alumni from collaborating suppliers (Brymer et al, ; Carnahan and Somaya, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three streams of literature are related to the subject. First, competitive dynamics literature examines rivals' responses to M&As completed by their competitors, but the reason the studies in this field choose to focus on rivals' responses is to explain acquiring firms' approximately zero or slight positive returns from M&As [21]. Second, quite a few studies explore the spillover effects of international M&As at the industry level in emerging markets (EMs).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, competitive retaliation depends on competitor awareness (Chen, Su, & Tsai, ). Accordingly, routinised, easily anticipated responses will likely encourage competitors to increase and vary retaliation to compound an acquirer’s integration challenges (Uhlenbruck, Hughes‐Morgan, Hitt, Ferrier, & Brymer, ). Therefore, we predict:
Hypothesis 4a : Redundancy during integration reduces organisational resistance. Hypothesis 4b : Redundancy during integration increases competitor retaliation.
…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%