Nodding syndrome is a highly debilitating, generalized seizure disorder, affecting children in subregions of sub-Saharan Africa. Despite many efforts towards finding its etiology, the exact cause of the syndrome still remains obscure. Therefore, to date, patients only receive a symptomatic care, including the administration of first-generation anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for seizure control. Since information about medication effectiveness within this population is completely lacking, the aim of this study was to perform therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to seek whether an answer could be provided to the question why for some patients the symptoms decrease, whilst in others the epileptic seizures remain poorly controlled. Seeing the challenging context in which sampling needed to take place (remote areas, devoid of electricity, running water, etc.), dried blood matrices (i.e. dried blood spots (DBS) and volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices) were considered fit-for-purpose.Seeing the similarities between the syndrome and other forms of epilepsy, also samples originating from patients suffering from (onchocerciasis-associated) epilepsy were included.In total, 68 patients with Nodding syndrome from Uganda, 58 Ugandan patients with epilepsy and 137 patients with onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) were included in this study. VAMS samples and DBS were analyzed using fully validated methods, involving manual extraction or fully automated extraction, respectively, prior to quantification using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.Analysis revealed that serum concentrations (calculated from DBS) within the respective reference ranges were attained for only 52.9% of the 68 Nodding syndrome patients treated with valproic acid, for 21.4% of the 56 Ugandan epilepsy patients treated with carbamazepine, and for 65.7% of the 137 onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy patients from the DRC treated with phenobarbital. In all other instances, concentrations were subtherapeutic. Furthermore, when comparing DBS to VAMS concentrations, an inexplicable overestimation was observed in the latter. Finally, no obvious link could be observed between the obtained drug concentrations and the amount of seizures experienced during the last month before sampling, disclosing the fact that the level of improvement of some patients cannot simply linked to reaching therapeutic concentrations.