2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River flow estimation from upstream flow records by artificial intelligence methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of artificial intelligence approaches, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), gene expression programming (GEP) and support vector machines (SVM), have received much attention in the last decades (Aytek and Alp, ; Turan and Yurdusev, ; Kisi et al , ; Sanikhani et al , ; Li et al , ; Mehr et al , ). The comprehensive review of such applications is beyond the scope of this paper, and only some related studies will be given here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of artificial intelligence approaches, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), gene expression programming (GEP) and support vector machines (SVM), have received much attention in the last decades (Aytek and Alp, ; Turan and Yurdusev, ; Kisi et al , ; Sanikhani et al , ; Li et al , ; Mehr et al , ). The comprehensive review of such applications is beyond the scope of this paper, and only some related studies will be given here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MLR methods have some disadvantages such as not fitting the observed data very well or diverting from tails in skewed data (Haghighatjou et al, 2008). Moreover, due to the advancement of computer science, many artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches have been developed for hydrological predictions, such as generalized regression neural network (GRNN) (Cigizoglu, 2005), feed forward back propagation neural networks (Turan and Yurdusev, 2009;Wang et al, 2009), support vector machine (Sujay Raghavendra and Deka, 2014), and least squares support vector machines (Okkan and Serbes, 2012). The AI-based models confront some drawbacks, such as possibility of getting trapped in local minima, over training, subjectivity in the determining of model parameters, initialization of the weights in each simulation randomly, and the components of its complex structure (Okkan and Serbes, 2012).…”
Section: Methods For Hydrological Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, in the literature relating to the application of the neural networks in forecasting models (Chtioui, Panigrahi & Francl, 1999;Cigizoglu & Alp, 2006;Firat & Gungor, 2009;Turan & Yurdusev, 2009), only two architectural formats are considered to be appropriate for the development of a forecasting model. One is the multilayer perceptron (MLP) format, which is a time-lag feed-forward neural network (TLFN), and the other is the generalized regression neural network…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%