2019
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River habitat homogenisation enhances trophic competition and promotes individual specialisation among young of the year fish

Abstract: In large rivers, fish ontogenic development success is mainly influenced by resource availability and by the possibility of species to adapt their diet (i.e. trophic niche). Humans have drastically modified freshwater habitats, notably for navigation purposes. Such modifications may reduce food availability for young of the year (YOY) fish and, consequently, influence their ability to reach the adult age. In the Meuse River, decrease of fish abundance is thought to be linked to a drastic reduction of phytoplan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…ecomorphological diversity, individual specialisation, macrophyte biomass, Moenkhausia forestii, nested diets niche variation hypothesis (Niche Hypothesis Variation), which suggests that niche expansion may occur due to variation in resource use among individuals of a single population. Thus, species considered generalists may be composed of specialist individuals that use a small subset of the entire niche of the population (Bolnick et al, 2003;Cobain, Steward, Trueman, & Jensen, 2019;Cunha, Wolff, & Hahn, 2018;Latli, Michel, Lepoint, & Kestemont, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ecomorphological diversity, individual specialisation, macrophyte biomass, Moenkhausia forestii, nested diets niche variation hypothesis (Niche Hypothesis Variation), which suggests that niche expansion may occur due to variation in resource use among individuals of a single population. Thus, species considered generalists may be composed of specialist individuals that use a small subset of the entire niche of the population (Bolnick et al, 2003;Cobain, Steward, Trueman, & Jensen, 2019;Cunha, Wolff, & Hahn, 2018;Latli, Michel, Lepoint, & Kestemont, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education and citizen science (43) Leisure time increases (44) New employment opportunities in GI mm (45) Transport system and car ownership decreases (54) Wheel-less transport infrastructure (55) Built structure declines (56) Self-repairing built infrastructure (57) Ecosystem service mimicry (58) Pest and invasive species mm ( 64 . The full wording agreed by the participants for each opportunity is given in Supplementary Table 1.…”
Section: Pollution Decreases Enhance Recreation (42)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, RAS may be unable to respond adequately to species population variation and phenology, or when species that are protected or of conservation concern are encountered. For hydrological systems in particular, participants noted that automated management could result in the homogenization of water currents and timings of flow, which are known to disrupt the lifecycles of flow-sensitive species 54 . Similarly, improved building maintenance could lead to the loss of nesting habitats and shelter (for example, for house sparrows Passer domesticus 55 ), especially for cavity and ground-nesting species.…”
Section: Built and Green Infrastructure Maintenance And Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hydrologically unstable streams typically host fewer specialist species, with more habitat generalist and siltation-tolerant species [108]. Hydrogeomorphic instability driven by anthropogenic landscape alteration may favor some tolerant species that can better cope with rapid rates of environmental change [109], whereas species with more flexible feeding strategies (i.e., ability to switch food resources, even to nonoptimal sources) are best able to cope with varied food resource availability [110]. This may have been (among other causes) reflected in CCA relationships in which tolerant generalist species (e.g., Creek Chub) occurred in similar relative abundances across sites that displayed a range of hydrogeomorphic characteristics.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%