2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

River network connectivity and fish diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a traditional understanding, different taxonomic groups are thought to have unique spatial patterns in river networks due to the distinct dispersal properties of certain taxonomic groups (He et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2013; Tonkin et al., 2018). For example, microbiota are mainly controlled by local environmental factors and thus exhibit a spatial pattern of greater species diversity in headwater than downstream (Besemer et al., 2013; Savio et al., 2015), while fish and insects have a higher biodiversity in the downstream than in the upstream due to their strong dispersal capacity in the river networks (Altermatt, 2013; Shao et al., 2019). However, it has recently been suggested that environmental variables outperform the spatial factors in structuring algal community in river networks (Jamoneau et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a traditional understanding, different taxonomic groups are thought to have unique spatial patterns in river networks due to the distinct dispersal properties of certain taxonomic groups (He et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2013; Tonkin et al., 2018). For example, microbiota are mainly controlled by local environmental factors and thus exhibit a spatial pattern of greater species diversity in headwater than downstream (Besemer et al., 2013; Savio et al., 2015), while fish and insects have a higher biodiversity in the downstream than in the upstream due to their strong dispersal capacity in the river networks (Altermatt, 2013; Shao et al., 2019). However, it has recently been suggested that environmental variables outperform the spatial factors in structuring algal community in river networks (Jamoneau et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, aquatic ecosystems have received less attention (Daam et al., 2019; Little et al., 2020; Vaughn, 2010), and most of the available studies were limited to micro‐ or mesocosms models (Cardinale et al., 2002; Jabiol et al., 2013; Pennekamp et al., 2018). Because effects of biodiversity loss themselves depend on the abiotic and biotic context and the spatial scale (Bond & Chase, 2002; Chase & Leibold, 2002; Daam et al., 2019; Vaughn, 2010), non‐trivial dependencies are expected, especially in heterogeneous and highly spatially structured river networks (Altermatt, 2013; Shao et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For brown trout, which migrate considerable distances, free connectivity of river systems is essential to reach spawning habitats. In addition, increased connectivity also increases biodiversity facilitating migration also for smaller fish species [44] and invertebrates. On the other hand, spreading of infectious agents possibly detrimental for vulnerable fish populations can be enhanced by migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of river network structure in shaping the genetic variation within and between populations has been commonly investigated for a broad range of freshwater organisms, including fish (Shao et al, 2019;Thomaz et al, 2016), insects (Finn et al, 2006(Finn et al, , 2007, and plants (Sander et al, 2018). In these studies, the observed population genetic patterns are generally described using four connectivity models that predict how populations with different life history traits and dispersal capabilities interact within their structured riverine habitat (Finn et al, 2007;Hughes et al, 2009).…”
Section: Landward-seaward Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%