River Water Quality: Who Cares, How Much and Why?

Abstract

An important motivation for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive is the creation of non-market environmental benefits, such as improved ecological quality, or greater opportunities for open-access river recreation via microbial pollution remediation. Pollution sources impacting on ecological or recreational water quality may be uncorrelated, but non-market benefits arising from riverine improvements are typically conflated within benefit valuation studies. Using stated preference choice experiments embedded within a survey that also collected respondents' socio-economic characteristics, we aimed to disaggregate these sources of value for different river users, thereby allowing decision makers to understand the consequences of adopting alternative investment strategies. Our results suggested that anglers derived greater value from improvements to the ecological quality of river water, in contrast to swimmers and rowers, for whom greater value is gained from improvements to recreational quality. More generally, we found three distinct groups of respondents: a majority preferring ecological over recreational improvements, a substantial minority holding opposing preference orderings, and a yet smaller proportion expressing relatively low values for either form of river quality enhancement. As such, this research demonstrates that the non-market benefits that may accrue from different types of water quality improvements are nuanced in terms of their potential beneficiaries and, by inference, their overall value and policy implications.

Achieving Sustainable Phosphorus Use in Food Systems through Circularisation

“…Producers Adopt best management practices to minimise P losses to water Such redesign also requires acceptance of greater social and environmental responsibility for sustainable P use by all the actors and sectors in the food chain, but this is a daunting task. The large number of different social groups within society have different definitions of well-being and different perceptions of sustainability [102]. A greater understanding of the knowledge flows in the food chain, and how these can be improved to increase awareness of food system inefficiencies and downstream environmental impacts could help to engender a culture of greater sustainability amongst all stakeholders.…”

Economic Valuation of Green Island, Taiwan: A Choice Experiment Method

“…Therefore, CEM can better solve the problem of comparing profit and loss between the multiple attributes of ecosystem services, and it can reveal public preferences for each eco-functional attribute of ecosystem services [34]. Thus, CEM has been widely used for non-market valuation, including species conservation [35][36][37][38][39], wetland recovery [40][41][42][43][44], ecotourism preferences [45][46][47][48][49][50], tourists' preferences for land, the environmental functions of national parks [21,[39][40][41]51,52], and the exploration of methods for altering specific ecosystem services to affect economic benefits [34,[53][54][55][56][57][58].…”

Value of river restoration when living near and far. The Atoyac Basinin Puebla, Mexico

“…Expressed preference methods have been employed to measure the value that populations afford to restoration projects of rivers and other surface water bodies by measuring individual consumer preferences, expressed through an individual's WTP (Brower & Pearce, 2005). Analysis focused on how the benefit received by an individual is influenced by the specific characteristics of the river, the individual's contact with this resource, the location of beneficiaries, the substitution of recreational sites, and socioeconomic characteristics (Hampson, Ferrini, Rigby & Bateman, 2017).…”