2015
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riverine habitat specificity constrains dispersion in a Neotropical fish (Characidae) along Southern Brazilian drainages

Abstract: Riverine habitat specificity constrains dispersion in a Neotropical fish (Characidae) along Southern Brazilian drainages. -Zoologica Scripta, 44, 374-382. Freshwater fishes often display a marked phylogeographic structure strongly associated with historical and ecological changes in the aquatic environment. Different ecological conditions in the same river drainage may act as permeable barriers to dispersion and gene flow. Previous studies recognized two discrete spatial components for the ichthyofauna in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that B. lethostigmus and D. itaimbe occur in the same drainages, are syntopic, and share a similar life history, the different phylogeographic pattern found for both species is striking. While D. itaimbe shows a strong genetic structure with well-defined mtDNA clades (Hirschmann et al, 2015), B. lethostigmus showed no genealogical structure, and only a very weak genetic structure based on mtDNA data. Such phylogeographic difference between these species may be explained by three different scenarios, or a combination of them: (1) Different mtDNA evolutionary rates between the two species; (2) Different colonization times of the two species in these drainages; and (3) Gene flow among B. lethostigmus populations through paleaodrainages hampering population structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Considering that B. lethostigmus and D. itaimbe occur in the same drainages, are syntopic, and share a similar life history, the different phylogeographic pattern found for both species is striking. While D. itaimbe shows a strong genetic structure with well-defined mtDNA clades (Hirschmann et al, 2015), B. lethostigmus showed no genealogical structure, and only a very weak genetic structure based on mtDNA data. Such phylogeographic difference between these species may be explained by three different scenarios, or a combination of them: (1) Different mtDNA evolutionary rates between the two species; (2) Different colonization times of the two species in these drainages; and (3) Gene flow among B. lethostigmus populations through paleaodrainages hampering population structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The mtDNA data set was analysed assuming an evolutionary rate of 0.01/site/Myr (Bermingham et al, 1997;Reeves, Bermingham, 2006;Ornelas-García et al, 2008) and a strict clock model, which is a generally well justified for analysis within a species or among a few closely related species (Li, Drummond, 2011). To compare the evolutionary history of B. lethostigmus to that of a sympatric species, we estimated coalescence times and population sizes for D. itaimbe based on sequences obtained from GenBank (KP399679 to KP399733; KP406648 to KP406702; Hirschmann et al, 2015). Based on the Bayesian Information Criterion in PartitionFinder (Lanfear et al, 2012) we assumed the HKY+I substitution model for COI and ND2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That species was described from the rio Mampituba and rio Araranguá, in Santa Catarina State (Britto & Reis, 2005) based on a few lots. These two rivers form, along with the rio Tramandaí drainage, an area of endemism in southern Brazil, sharing a number of endemic fish species (Malabarba & Isaia, 1992;Reis & Schaefer, 1998;Hirschmann et al, 2015), and historically united in a single palaeodrainage in the area exposed with the retreat in sea level during the Last Glacial Maximum . Surprisingly, S. salmacis was not recorded from the rio Maquiné or rio Três Forquilhas in the rio Tramandaí drainage, regardless the extensive collections of fishes from rio Tramandaí drainage (e.g., see map of distributional records of Corydoras paleatus in this drainage at Malabarba et al, 2013: 65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%