2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA 5-Methylcytosine Analysis by Bisulfite Sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(169 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a transcriptome-wide landscape of m 5 C profiles, we performed RNA-BisSeq analysis on RNA samples purified from human HeLa cells. Based on a recently described method 29 , we used ACT random hexamers devoid of Gs to prime the reverse transcription (RT) of bisulfite-treated poly(A)-enriched RNA samples aiming to avoid copying inefficiently deaminated RNA templates. Since RNA-BisSeq cannot distinguish m 5 C from its potential oxidation product of hm 5 C, we applied UHPLC-MRM-MS/MS (ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry coupled with multiple-reaction monitoring) to verify the presence of m 5 C and hm 5 C in mammalian mRNAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a transcriptome-wide landscape of m 5 C profiles, we performed RNA-BisSeq analysis on RNA samples purified from human HeLa cells. Based on a recently described method 29 , we used ACT random hexamers devoid of Gs to prime the reverse transcription (RT) of bisulfite-treated poly(A)-enriched RNA samples aiming to avoid copying inefficiently deaminated RNA templates. Since RNA-BisSeq cannot distinguish m 5 C from its potential oxidation product of hm 5 C, we applied UHPLC-MRM-MS/MS (ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry coupled with multiple-reaction monitoring) to verify the presence of m 5 C and hm 5 C in mammalian mRNAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the location of modifications with nucleotide resolution, reverse transcription (RT) and truncation approaches have also been employed. (6,(15)(16)(17) These approaches rely on manipulating either buffer conditions or the modified RNA directly, to encourage the RT enzyme to terminate prematurely upon encountering a base with either an endogenous modification or an adduct appended to a modification by a specific chemical reaction. While RT truncation-based methods provide localization information and estimates of modification quantification, they are complicated by RT-bias and cannot interrogate multiple modifications from the same single molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the error rate of Illumina-based sequencing [145] might call artefacts or preclude the accurate detection of less abundant modifications or of modifications that only occur in a small subset of cells or transcripts. Chemical pre-treatment of RNAs might introduce artefacts, as has been observed for RNA bisulfite sequencing [146]. In addition, genomic SNPs might be interpreted as actual RNA modification-induced RT mismatches, and mapping reads across splice junctions or at polyadenylation sites may lead to inaccurately calling false positives, which is a major pitfall for RNA editing mapping, especially in non-model organisms.…”
Section: Where Might Rna Modifications Be?mentioning
confidence: 99%