2017
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201643700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA activation‐independent DNA targeting of the Type III CRISPR‐Cas system by a Csm complex

Abstract: The CRISPR-Cas system is an adaptive and heritable immune response that destroys invading foreign nucleic acids. The effector complex of the Type III CRISPR-Cas system targets RNA and DNA in a transcription-coupled manner, but the exact mechanism of DNA targeting by this complex remains elusive. In this study, an effector Csm holocomplex derived from is reconstituted with a minimalistic combination of Csm12345, and shows RNA targeting and RNA-activated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) targeting activities. Unexpect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the stoichiometry of both Csm and Cmr complexes agrees with several high or medium resolution EM structures, including TtCmr complexes (Spilman et al, 2013;Staals et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 2015) and the Pyrococcus furiosus Cmr (PfCmr) complex (Ramia et al, 2014;Spilman et al, 2013), as well as the Cmr1-deficient chimeric Cmr-ssDNA complex (Osawa et al, 2015). In contrast, our stoichiometry does not agree with those obtained from low-resolution Csm complexes, including TthCsm complex (Staals et al, 2014), Sulfolobus solfataricus Csm (Rouillon et al, 2013), and Thermococcus onnurineus Csm (Park et al, 2017). Also, our stoichiometry differs from that for previously reported SthCsm, for which a stoichiometry was calculated on the basis of mass spectrometric data (Kazlauskiene et al, 2016).…”
Section: Formation Of Csm/cmr Complexcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the stoichiometry of both Csm and Cmr complexes agrees with several high or medium resolution EM structures, including TtCmr complexes (Spilman et al, 2013;Staals et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 2015) and the Pyrococcus furiosus Cmr (PfCmr) complex (Ramia et al, 2014;Spilman et al, 2013), as well as the Cmr1-deficient chimeric Cmr-ssDNA complex (Osawa et al, 2015). In contrast, our stoichiometry does not agree with those obtained from low-resolution Csm complexes, including TthCsm complex (Staals et al, 2014), Sulfolobus solfataricus Csm (Rouillon et al, 2013), and Thermococcus onnurineus Csm (Park et al, 2017). Also, our stoichiometry differs from that for previously reported SthCsm, for which a stoichiometry was calculated on the basis of mass spectrometric data (Kazlauskiene et al, 2016).…”
Section: Formation Of Csm/cmr Complexcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…2c, only CTR activated the LdCsm DNase, indicating that mismatches between the 3ʹ anti-tag of the target RNA and the corresponding 5ʹ tag of crRNA are essential for the activation. These results are in good agreement with those reported for other characterized type III CRISPR-Cas systems 15,17,19,20,31,34,35 . We further tested the minimal concentration of CTR is required for the ssDNase activity of LdCsm.…”
Section: Delbrueckii Subsp Bulgaricus Encodes a Novel Iii-a Crispsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Biochemical and structural analyses of different type III CRISPR-Cas systems have revealed that the HD domain is responsible for ssDNA cleavage 15,19,20,31,34,35 , Palm1 and Palm2 domains function in cOA synthesis [38][39][40][41]43 whereas the Linker domain plays a regulatory role in both target RNA-activated DNA cleavage and cOA synthesis 54 . However, it remains unclear whether a concerted action of different Cas10 domains would be required to yield Csm DNase with optimal activity.…”
Section: Multiple Cas10 Domains Contribute To the Ldcsm Dnase Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The type III CRISPR-Cas system possess transcription dependent RNA and DNA cleavage capabilities, hence efficiently providing immunity against invading genomic elements in Staphylococcus epidermidis (Koonin and Makarova, 2013; Samai et al, 2015; Guo et al, 2019). The RNA cleavage is mediated by the Csm3/cmr4 or csm6/csx1 complex, while the DNA cleavage is catalyzed by Cas10 (Csm1) (Grüschow et al, 2019a; Park et al, 2017; Samai et al, 2015; Tamulaitis et al, 2017). ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%