We report that mice lacking the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U (hnRNP U) in the heart develop lethal dilated cardiomyopathy and display numerous defects in cardiac pre-mRNA splicing. Mutant hearts have disorganized cardiomyocytes, impaired contractility, and abnormal excitation-contraction coupling activities. RNA-seq analyses of Hnrnpu mutant hearts revealed extensive defects in alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs encoding proteins known to be critical for normal heart development and function, including Titin and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II delta (Camk2d). Loss of hnRNP U expression in cardiomyocytes also leads to aberrant splicing of the pre-mRNA encoding the excitation-contraction coupling component Junctin. We found that the protein product of an alternatively spliced Junctin isoform is N-glycosylated at a specific asparagine site that is required for interactions with specific protein partners. Our findings provide conclusive evidence for the essential role of hnRNP U in heart development and function and in the regulation of alternative splicing.T he expression of more than 95% of human genes is affected by alternative pre-mRNA splicing (AS) (1, 2). Differentially spliced isoforms play distinct roles in a temporally and spatially specific manner (3), and mutations that lead to aberrant splicing are the cause of many human genetic diseases (4). RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a central role in the regulation of alternative splicing during development and disease. They function primarily by positively or negatively regulating splice-site recognition by the spliceosome (1). Many RBPs are expressed in specific tissues, and AS is regulated by the combinatorial activities of these factors on specific pre-mRNAs through their interactions with distinct regulatory sequences in premRNA that function as splicing enhancers or silencers (5).The developing heart is one of the best studied systems where splicing changes occur during normal development, and mutations affecting specific splicing outcomes contribute to cardiomyopathy (6, 7). Although these mutations can either disrupt splicing elements or affect the expression of specific splicing factors, the latter mechanism is clearly responsible for the distinct splicing profiles at different developmental stages. For example, the dynamics of alternative splicing during postnatal heart development correlate with expression changes of many RBPs, including CUG-BP, Elavlike family member 1 (CELF1), Muscleblind-like 1 (MBNL1), and FOX proteins (8). Detailed biochemical studies have elucidated the mechanisms by which these splicing factors regulate splicing in a position-and context-dependent manner (9, 10). The function of other RBPs during heart development has also been studied. For example, two of the muscle-specific splicing factors, RBM20 and RBM24, play distinct roles in splicing regulation. RBM20 mainly acts as a splicing repressor, as its absence leads to multiple exon inclusion events in the heart. For example, the Titin gene is one of...