2016
DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2016.1177660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA extraction for RNA sequencing of archival renal tissues

Abstract: Total RNA can be extracted from archival renal biopsies in sufficient quality and quantity from one human kidney biopsy section and from around 100 LCM glomerular cross-sections to enable successful RNA library preparation and sequencing using commercially available RNA extraction kits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RINe has been widely used as an indicator of RNA quality in NGS, microarray, and qPCR [5][6][7]. However, the DV200 is more suitable than the RINe for quantification of RNA because it can be applied to evaluate not only RNAs extracted from fresh or frozen samples but also samples with lower RINe values, such as RNAs extracted from FFPE samples [8,9]. In our study, the DV200 showed better correlation with the amount of the 1 st NGS library product compared with the RINe even for low-quality samples such as FFPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RINe has been widely used as an indicator of RNA quality in NGS, microarray, and qPCR [5][6][7]. However, the DV200 is more suitable than the RINe for quantification of RNA because it can be applied to evaluate not only RNAs extracted from fresh or frozen samples but also samples with lower RINe values, such as RNAs extracted from FFPE samples [8,9]. In our study, the DV200 showed better correlation with the amount of the 1 st NGS library product compared with the RINe even for low-quality samples such as FFPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the comparison of different studies using human FFPE renal biopsies for glomerular micro-dissection, we performed a literature search in PubMed looking for articles published until March 2017. There are five studies using different reference transcripts or genes (GAPDH, ACTB and Eukaryotic 18S rRNA) [ 9 13 ]. Detailed differences between these studies and our study are highlighted in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the certain degradation of our RNA samples, we had a similar range for RNA purity in between different samples as well as between different amounts of RNA, which seems to be valuable for further analyses [ 30 ]. As shown in Table 3 , one recent study performed a comprehensive analysis for RNA purity, quality and quantity [ 9 ]. Beside this study no other documents the A260/A280 ratio, which might be due to the fact that it is difficult or even impossible to obtain reliable absorption values at A260 in micro-dissected FFPE tissue [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is no single exclusive marker for CESC identification, confirmation of enrichment after LCM was possible only by RT‐PCR. Methods are available to isolate good quality RNA from laser capture microdissected cells from fresh cryosections (Bath et al, ) or from formalin fixed tissue cross sections (Landolt, Marti, Beisland, Flatberg, & Eikrem, ) and hence LCM of Giemsa stained cytospin smears of limbal basal epithelial cells was adopted in this study. The RNA extracted from such cells captured by LCM had RIN values in the range 4–7.4 (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%