In recent years, antisense therapy has emerged as an increasingly important therapeutic approach to tackle several genetic disorders, including inborn errors of metabolism. Intronic mutations activating cryptic splice sites are particularly amenable to antisense therapy, as the canonical splice sites remain intact, thus retaining the potential for restoring constitutive splicing. Mutational analysis of Portuguese galactosemic patients revealed the intronic variation c.820 þ 13A4G as the second most prevalent mutation, strongly suggesting its pathogenicity. The aim of this study was to functionally characterize this intronic variation, to elucidate its pathogenic molecular mechanism(s) and, ultimately, to correct it by antisense therapy. Minigene splicing assays in two distinct cell lines and patients' transcript analyses showed that the mutation activates a cryptic donor splice site, inducing an aberrant splicing of the GALT pre-mRNA, which in turn leads to a frameshift with inclusion of a premature stop codon (p.D274Gfs*17). Functional-structural studies of the recombinant wild-type and truncated GALT showed that the latter is devoid of enzymatic activity and prone to aggregation. Finally, two locked nucleic acid oligonucleotides, designed to specifically recognize the mutation, successfully restored the constitutive splicing, thus establishing a proof of concept for the application of antisense therapy as an alternative strategy for the clearly insufficient dietary treatment in classic galactosemia. European Journal of Human Genetics (2015) 23, 500-506; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.149; published online 23 July 2014
INTRODUCTIONOver the last years, splicing mutations emerged as an important pathogenic mechanism, underlying 10-30% of genetic diseases (HGMD Professional 2013.1). 1 Splicing accuracy depends not only on the recognition of exon-intron junctions, defined by intronic ciselements: 5 0 splice site, 3 0 splice site, branch site and poly-pyrimidine tract, 2-4 but also on more discrete elements, entitled splicing regulatory elements, which direct the splicing machinery to use the correct splice sites. Exonic and intronic splicing enhancers stimulate splicing and serve as binding sites mainly for serine/arginine-rich proteins. Exonic and intronic splicing silencers repress splicing, and often function by binding proteins from the heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein family. 2,4-6 Although most reported splicing mutations directly abolish an authentic splice site or create a novel one, an increasing number of disease-associated variations that alter splicing enhancers or silencers have been reported. 2,7-9 Each nucleotide modification should be considered a potential candidate for splicing alterations, as not only intronic but also nonsense, missense and silent modifications may impact splicing. 7 Accordingly, constitutive and regulated splicing reactions are considered potential therapeutic targets and novel strategies for their correction are evolving. Among these, antisense oligonucleotides display an exquisi...