2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNApuzzler: efficient outerplanar drawing of RNA-secondary structures

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, Elias [24] optimized existing visualization tools based on the corresponding tree that is converted by targets and template structures. Thereafter, to overcome the drawback that some methods cannot always produce intersection-free drawing [25], Wiegreffe proposed an optimization algorithm called RNApuzzler.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Elias [24] optimized existing visualization tools based on the corresponding tree that is converted by targets and template structures. Thereafter, to overcome the drawback that some methods cannot always produce intersection-free drawing [25], Wiegreffe proposed an optimization algorithm called RNApuzzler.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures are represented by RNA secondary structures that can be drawn as planar graphs with some constraints. For example, RNApuzzler [20] uses a similar algorithmic solution to remove overlap by relaxing some constraints; the algorithm recursively checks and solves ancestor and sibling intersections.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related approaches can also be found in application-specific work. Algorithms that deal with overlap removal are required for Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) structures [1,20]. These structures are represented by RNA secondary structures that can be drawn as planar graphs with some constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithmically, the approaches may use (1) Force-directed layouts where nucleotides represent the nodes of a graph and base pairs as well as other interactions are shown as lines connecting the nodes. These layouts are governed by the attraction and repulsion between the nucleotides and interactions (for example Forna 8 ); or (2) Rule-based methods 9 , such as RNAView 10 , 3DNA 11 , PseudoViewer 12 , R2R 13 , RNA2Drawer 14 , jViz 15 , RNApuzzler 16 and many others, for a more comprehensive review see 17 , 18 . However, none of these methods achieves all five properties of ideal RNA 2D structure diagrams 18 , 19 : they should be modular to reflect functional domains, appear similar for related structures despite sequence or minor structural changes to allow for easy comparison, avoid overlaps and ensure visual clarity, be a realistic representation of the 3D structure (if known), and finally be aesthetically pleasing 18 , 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, while dot plots are useful for comparative analysis in the hands of expert users 20 , they are difficult for users to interpret; arc plots, which show sequence conservation and base pairs, can be prohibitively large and make it difficult to examine small structural changes; circular diagrams can be uninformative and can make small structural changes hard to analyse; while force-directed layouts are not always robust against changes in the sequence or structure, making a comparison across related structures difficult. The rule-based methods can reliably produce diagrams even for large RNA structures 16 , but they do not take advantage of the community-accepted layouts. In addition, some methods can show other issues such as overlaps and a lack of visual clarity (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%