2017
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNase III Nucleases and the Evolution of Antiviral Systems

Abstract: Every living entity requires the capacity to defend against viruses in some form. From bacteria to plants to arthropods, cells retain the capacity to capture genetic material, process it in a variety of ways, and subsequently use it to generate pathogen-specific small RNAs. These small RNAs can then be used to provide specificity to an otherwise non-specific nuclease, generating a potent antiviral system. While small RNA-based defenses in chordates are less utilized, the protein-based antiviral invention in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Receptor engagement activates signal transduction via the Jak/STAT pathway, leading to the transcription of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that work together to inhibit the cellular processes required by the virus to replicate and spread [ 22 ]. This narrow focus on vertebrates and model invertebrate species has given the impression that invertebrates use gene silencing by viRNAs to control virus replication, whereas vertebrates replaced this defense strategy with the IFN system [ 21 , 23 ].…”
Section: Antiviral Defense In the Animal Kingdommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Receptor engagement activates signal transduction via the Jak/STAT pathway, leading to the transcription of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that work together to inhibit the cellular processes required by the virus to replicate and spread [ 22 ]. This narrow focus on vertebrates and model invertebrate species has given the impression that invertebrates use gene silencing by viRNAs to control virus replication, whereas vertebrates replaced this defense strategy with the IFN system [ 21 , 23 ].…”
Section: Antiviral Defense In the Animal Kingdommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, identifying virus-derived siRNAs, by high-throughput sequencing, would confirm whether C. gigas utilizes this antiviral pathway to control these viruses. This knowledge could help address the question of why the type I IFN response supplanted siRNA antiviral pathway as the dominant antiviral innate response in vertebrates [ 15 , 23 ]. In mammalian cells, evidence is mounting to suggest that the type I IFN and RNAi antiviral systems are incompatible with each other [ 21 ].…”
Section: Evolutionary Origins Of Antiviral Defense Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the various location and extent of bulges within the upper stem region of type II dual-gRNAs, these findings imply that the hybrid region does not undergo a strong selection pressure for recognition by RNase III. At least in part, this relative promiscuity, most likely, owes to the fact that RNase III is a highly conserved protein [49].…”
Section: Evolution Of Tracrrna: Random Walk Within the Stability Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DUF283 acts as an annealer that assists hybridization between the complementary strands of nucleic acids [21]. The function of RNase III domain is to cleave dsRNA, leaving the 2 nt overhang at 3′ end of the product [22,23]. The N- or C-termini of dsRBDs participate in the regulation of the protein nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution and also have the capacity to bind to dsRNAs [24,25].…”
Section: Rnai Pathway Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%