2010
DOI: 10.5751/es-03272-150315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road Impacts on Abundance, Call Traits, and Body Size of Rainforest Frogs in Northeast Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, urban great tits were found to sing at higher frequencies than rural populations (Slabbekoorn & Peet, ). In anurans, positive (Hoskin & Goosem, ) and negative (Hoskin et al ., ) correlations were found, but body size and phylogenetic relationships among species, two important factors, were not considered in these studies. Taking into account these two factors, Vargas‐Salinas & Amézquita () found no significant difference in call dominant frequency between stream‐ and non‐stream‐dwelling species, whereas Röhr et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, urban great tits were found to sing at higher frequencies than rural populations (Slabbekoorn & Peet, ). In anurans, positive (Hoskin & Goosem, ) and negative (Hoskin et al ., ) correlations were found, but body size and phylogenetic relationships among species, two important factors, were not considered in these studies. Taking into account these two factors, Vargas‐Salinas & Amézquita () found no significant difference in call dominant frequency between stream‐ and non‐stream‐dwelling species, whereas Röhr et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a choice, females prefer lower frequency calls, indicating larger and/or more experienced males (Wollerman 1998). Although found no relationship between male size and vocalization in areas affected by traffic noise, Hoskin & Goosem (2010) demonstrated that smaller males are concentrated closer to roads (with the loudest noise) and have higher frequency calls. Thus, these individuals may become less attractive to females (Wollerman 1998).…”
Section: Traffic Volumementioning
confidence: 92%
“…A few studies have been conducted to evaluate traffic volume × traffic noise for some species of tropical birds and amphibians (Kaiser & Hammers 2009, Parris & Schneider 2009, Hoskin & Goosem 2010, Kaiser et al 2011. Studies in the area of individual fitness have shown that although reptiles and terrestrial mammals do not use acoustic communication strategies such as those found in amphibians and birds (Zug et al 2001, Pough et al 2008, they may perceive noisy areas as less desirable, affecting the individual without necessarily affecting the population in the short and medium term.…”
Section: Knowledge Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, the impact of anthropogenic noise on wildlife has drawn an increasing interest among bioacousticians in the past years, notably with studies on city noise pollution effects on birds [2227], road noise effects on frogs [28,29] and marine noise effects on fishes and marine mammals [3032]. Despite these studies, the effect of natural noise on the ecology and evolution of animal species is rarely investigated [33,34], and ambient noise level remains an underused variable in ecological studies [3539].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%