SAE Technical Paper Series 2021
DOI: 10.4271/2021-01-5078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road Projections: Impact on Road Users and Potential to Enhance Awareness of Backing Situation in Parking Lots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One encouraging thing is that more studies on specific application methods of road projection or communication lamp have been recently attempted and showed the possibilities of the TSGL. 9,10,13,14 If follow-up studies on the application of TSGL sufficiently prove that it…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One encouraging thing is that more studies on specific application methods of road projection or communication lamp have been recently attempted and showed the possibilities of the TSGL. 9,10,13,14 If follow-up studies on the application of TSGL sufficiently prove that it…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, The impact of road projection symbols on road users, i.e., pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers, was considered in the backing up situation in parking lots. A total of thirty-two subjects were involved in this experiment [32]. Results showed that onroad projection in the backing up situation increases the on-road awareness, understanding, and perception of the whole situation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASA-TLX [44], Van der Laan user acceptance scale [45], an affinity for technology interaction scale [46], system usability scale [47], and safety scale [48] were employed. However, some custom self-designed questionnaires were considered by employing an already established unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model [32,49,50]. Table 1 shows the questionnaire used in this study.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have shown possible solutions for how AVs can be integrated into the current traffic and what implementations are necessary to improve the interaction of AVs and other RUs [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Although displays mounted on AVs are a possible solution for communication and prevention of accidents, ground projections have advantages to preventing accidents or conflicts with vulnerable RUs by illustrating a projection directly in the addressed RUs field of view [4,6,7,[10][11][12][13]. To guarantee successful communication of a projection-based humanmachine interface, several studies are investigating aspects such as visibility thresholds, necessary resolution, comprehension of the projected content, and whether the projection should be in the near-or far-field of the vehicle [4,5,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current studies focus on simple pattern-based projection [7,[10][11][12][13]16,18], except for Stuckert and Khanh's [19] study which considers complex patterns such as text-based projections. The testing focuses on the resolution requirements under several ambient luminance levels in the mesopic vision with a constant contrast ratio to not influence the visual acuity perception [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%