2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roadwise review has limited congruence with actual driving performance of aging drivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are potentially many distractions present during driving (Editorial, 2001), including conversations with passengers, or unpredictable events that increase the risk of crashes. The current findings may be applied to future research on clinical populations with various brain disorders (e.g., Ott et al, 2000; Bedard et al, 2011) to determine how brain damage affects the ability to adapt to daily driving tasks. The shift in brain activation indicates that the assessment of fitness to drive should consider different levels of driving demands and more selective evaluations of driving ability (e.g., in different traffic conditions, or driving while conversing with the examiner).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there are potentially many distractions present during driving (Editorial, 2001), including conversations with passengers, or unpredictable events that increase the risk of crashes. The current findings may be applied to future research on clinical populations with various brain disorders (e.g., Ott et al, 2000; Bedard et al, 2011) to determine how brain damage affects the ability to adapt to daily driving tasks. The shift in brain activation indicates that the assessment of fitness to drive should consider different levels of driving demands and more selective evaluations of driving ability (e.g., in different traffic conditions, or driving while conversing with the examiner).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among programs with practical training, most have been found to be effective in improving driving performance overall (Bédard et al 2008;Lavallière et al 2009;Marottoli, van Ness, et al 2007;Marottoli, Allore, et al 2007), at intersections (Romoser and Fisher 2009), or for hazard recognition (Horswill et al 2010). However, some studies demonstrated an association between self-reported abilities and driving performance Molnar et al 2010), whereas others did not (Bédard et al 2011;Scialfa et al 2010); evaluations of such programs are complex. Knowing more about psychosocial factors related to driving such as driver perceptions, beliefs, and openness to change would help to maximize the fit between education program content and outcomes (Tuokko et al 2007) and further improve older drivers' skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After a thorough review of these issues, the expert panel affirmed the following statements at the highest level of evidence (i.e., evidence is strong and allows for an evidence-based consensus statement-Level 1): Ultimately, it is important that occupational therapists continue to apply an evidence-based framework to the determination of fitness-to-drive for seniors. An evidence-based framework implies that the proper research activities, from the individual studies to the development of the tool, have taken place (Bédard et al, 2011). The tools currently used by driver rehabilitation specialists to determine fitness-to-drive vary greatly (Dickerson, 2013) and not all tools were developed with the same amount of rigor.…”
Section: Statement 1: a Decision About Continued Restricted Or Cessmentioning
confidence: 99%