2020
DOI: 10.1121/10.0000935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roaring and repetition: How bowhead whales adjust their call density and source level (Lombard effect) in the presence of natural and seismic airgun survey noise

Abstract: Over 500 000 automated and manual acoustic localizations, measured over seven years between 2008 and 2014, were used to examine how natural wind-driven noise and anthropogenic seismic airgun survey noise influence bowhead whale call densities (calls/km2/min) and source levels during their fall migration in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Noise masking effects, which confound measurements of behavioral changes, were removed using a modified point transect theory. The authors found that mean call densities generally r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6). For S307 and S309, the pattern was different in that the SECR detection functions were unreasonably flat-unreasonable because we do not expect to detect bowhead whale calls at 30 km with probability ~ 0.9 (Thode et al 2020)-and estimates of SECR were extremely large. The proportion plot for S107 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6). For S307 and S309, the pattern was different in that the SECR detection functions were unreasonably flat-unreasonable because we do not expect to detect bowhead whale calls at 30 km with probability ~ 0.9 (Thode et al 2020)-and estimates of SECR were extremely large. The proportion plot for S107 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For PS and DS, data were truncated at w PS = 4 km and w DS = 30 km, respectively. Previous work (Blackwell et al 2015;Thode et al 2020) concluded that 80% of all whale calls are detected within 3.5 km radius of a sensor, regardless of their source level (how loud they were). We assumed that no calls could be detected from beyond 200 km and, hence, set w SECR = 200 km.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to understand the risks associated with changing Arctic noise conditions, it is essential to identify biologically relevant noise thresholds that have the potential to influence critical behaviours [30,31]. In the context of this study, we define a biologically relevant noise threshold as one that has the demonstrated potential to impair acoustically and contextually mediated biological activities (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done by first excluding periods of time when vessels were observed in the study area, then excluding recordings where boat noise was audible or could be seen in the spectrograms, and finally checking that the power spectral density of the noise fitted the wind noise curves described by Wenz (1962) and Cato (2012). Similar results were also obtained by Thode et al (2020) who found a Lombard effect in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in response to wind-dominated ambient noise. The study was conducted in the Beaufort Sea, where the authors were able to exclude the presence of anthropogenic noise due to the scarcity of human activities in the area.…”
Section: Vocal Plasticity Operates Within the Requirements Of Social mentioning
confidence: 56%