1999
DOI: 10.1017/s1057060899082031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robert Kilwardby on the Relation of Virtue to Happiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was because of the prominence of these two Dominican stalwarts that some of Kilwardby's works would only be edited in the second half of the 20th century, with a significant number of his works yet to be edited in Latin and translated from Latin even in the second decade of the 21st century. The Kilwardby niche research is nevertheless focussed on rehabilitating Kilwardby from apparent oblivion as an early scholastic who influenced later scholasticism significantly with his interpretation of Aristotelian logic and his reinterpretation of the place of grammar in the old trivium (alongside logic 13.From the recent 'hourglass' research, it thus becomes possible to profile Kilwardby responsibly and concisely for the sake of the broader discipline: compare, against the background of the previous three footnotes, Kilwardby's primary texts (1976Kilwardby's primary texts ( , 1982Kilwardby's primary texts ( -1995Kilwardby's primary texts ( , 1987Kilwardby's primary texts ( , 1993 as well as Broadie (2006:611-615); Celano (1999Celano ( :149-162, 2013 and rhetoric), as well as his idiosyncratic synthesis of Augustinian and Aristotelian elements in the standardised reception of both traditions in the 13th century.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was because of the prominence of these two Dominican stalwarts that some of Kilwardby's works would only be edited in the second half of the 20th century, with a significant number of his works yet to be edited in Latin and translated from Latin even in the second decade of the 21st century. The Kilwardby niche research is nevertheless focussed on rehabilitating Kilwardby from apparent oblivion as an early scholastic who influenced later scholasticism significantly with his interpretation of Aristotelian logic and his reinterpretation of the place of grammar in the old trivium (alongside logic 13.From the recent 'hourglass' research, it thus becomes possible to profile Kilwardby responsibly and concisely for the sake of the broader discipline: compare, against the background of the previous three footnotes, Kilwardby's primary texts (1976Kilwardby's primary texts ( , 1982Kilwardby's primary texts ( -1995Kilwardby's primary texts ( , 1987Kilwardby's primary texts ( , 1993 as well as Broadie (2006:611-615); Celano (1999Celano ( :149-162, 2013 and rhetoric), as well as his idiosyncratic synthesis of Augustinian and Aristotelian elements in the standardised reception of both traditions in the 13th century.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%