2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robin–Robin preconditioned Krylov methods for fluid–structure interaction problems

Abstract: In this work we propose a Robin-Robin preconditioner combined with Krylov iterations for the solution of the interface system arising in fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems. It can be seen as a partitioned FSI procedure and in this respect it generalizes the ideas introduced in [Badia, Nobile and Vergara, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008) 7027 -7051]. We analyze the convergence of GMRES iterations with the Robin-Robin preconditioner on a model problem and compare its efficiency with some existing algorithms.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
138
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the partitioned case the successive solution of the fluid and solid subproblems in an iterative framework is carried out (see, e.g., [9,11,39,46,55,105,134]). In this case, the schemes feature in general poor convergence properties due to the added mass effect, that predicts a breakdown of performances when the values of the densities of fluid and structure are close as it happens in hemodynamics [10,39,69,76,137]. Alternatively, one could consider space-time finite elements, see, e.g., [17,187], or the iso-geometric analysis, see [15].…”
Section: Numerical Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the partitioned case the successive solution of the fluid and solid subproblems in an iterative framework is carried out (see, e.g., [9,11,39,46,55,105,134]). In this case, the schemes feature in general poor convergence properties due to the added mass effect, that predicts a breakdown of performances when the values of the densities of fluid and structure are close as it happens in hemodynamics [10,39,69,76,137]. Alternatively, one could consider space-time finite elements, see, e.g., [17,187], or the iso-geometric analysis, see [15].…”
Section: Numerical Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few works have focused on this aspect. We mention [7,25,37] among the monolithic schemes, which build the whole non-linear system, and [33] among the partitioned schemes, which consist in the successive solution of the subproblems in an iterative framework (see also [15,5,11,4,10] in the case of the linear elasticity). In this work, we focus on partitioned strategies, whose main difficulties are:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures a smooth ψ function and an accurate tracking of the free surface. Note that condition (8) enforces that the gradient of ψ in the the direction of the external boundary normal is null, except in those elements cuts by Γ free , where the essential boundary condition prevails. This approach yields a smooth initial field, which is the main objective we pursue.…”
Section: Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original immersed boundary method [59] and in the fictitious domain method [43], the part of the computational mesh which is not covered by the physical domain is considered to be, and computed as if it was, made of the same material as the physical domain. Although this approach can be convenient and it has advantageous properties when dealing with fluid-structure interaction problems using a partitioned approach and facing the so called added-mass effect [41,9,8,21,32], it also introduces an error due to the fact that temporal derivatives in nodes close to the boundary are computed using velocity values from the non-physical, meaningless domain. This is also the case for other approaches like the ones presented in [61,52,51], where some kind of approximation needs to be done in order to compute the time derivative close to the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%