Robin Sequence

Morrison, Kerry A.; Collares, Marcus Vinícius Martins; Flores, Roberto L.

doi:10.1016/j.cps.2021.03.005

Cited by 20 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Patients with severe HFM may present with breathing and feeding disorders during the neonatal period (i.e., within the first 28 days of life), manifested as obstructive sleep apnea, severe mandibular dysplasia, and micrognathia. The treatment of these children is usually tracheal intubation and tongue‐lip adhesion combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (Morrison et al, 2021). The rate of distraction osteogenesis in neonates is 1–2 mm/day to minimize the intubation time (Denny & Kalantarian, 2002).…”

Section: Treatment Optionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The etiology, clinical features, and treatment options of hemifacial microsomia

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The second most frequent craniomaxillofacial congenital deformity is hemifacial microsomia (HFM). Patients often accompany short mandible, ear dysplasia, facial nerve, and soft tissue dysplasia. The etiology of HFM is not fully understood. To organize the possible up‐to‐date information on the etiology, craniofacial phenotypes, and therapeutic alternatives in order to fully comprehend the HFM. Reviewing the potential causes, exploring the clinical features of HFM and summarizing the available treatment options. Vascular malformation, Meckel's cartilage abnormalities, and cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs) abnormalities are three potential etiology hypotheses. The commonly used clinical classification for HFM is OMENS, OMENS‐plus, and SAT. Other craniofacial anomalies, like dental defects, and zygomatic deformities, are still not precisely documented in the classification. Patients with moderate phenotypes may not need any treatment from infancy through adulthood. However, patients with severe HFM require to undergo multiple surgeries to address facial asymmetries, such as mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), autologous costochondral rib graft (CCG), orthodontic and orthognathic treatment, and facial soft tissue reconstruction. It is anticipated that etiology research will examine the pathogenic mechanism of HFM. A precise treatment for HFM may be possible with thoroughly documented phenotypes and a pathogenic diagnosis.

show abstract

Section: Treatment Optionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The treatment of these children is usually tracheal intubation and tongue-lip adhesion combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (Morrison et al, 2021). The rate of distraction osteogenesis in neonates is 1-2 mm/day to minimize the intubation time (Denny & Kalantarian, 2002).…”

Section: Ta B L E 4 Sat Classification Of Hfmmentioning

confidence: 99%

The etiology, clinical features, and treatment options of hemifacial microsomia

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a well-accepted surgical treatment for patients with RS 2 . By elongating the mandible, MDO displaces the tongue base anteriorly, thereby alleviating the airway obstruction.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By elongating the mandible, MDO displaces the tongue base anteriorly, thereby alleviating the airway obstruction. The procedure is performed in infants that fail conservative management like prone positioning or noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure 1,2 . It has begun to replace surgical treatments like tongue lip adhesion and tracheostomy due to more favorable outcomes 2,3 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Delayed Sublingual Edema Following Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

Miller¹,

Jungbauer²,

Carroll³

et al. 2023

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors aim to report a rare sequela following neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) involving delayed onset sublingual swelling. They performed a retrospective chart review of 3 patients who presented with delayed onset sublingual edema following neonatal MDO. The 3 patients presented at 2, 4, and 12 months following MDO for micrognathia secondary to Robin sequence with intermittent sublingual swelling associated with sialorrhea and feeding difficulties. There was no associated recent illness, fevers, or purulent drainage. All 3 children underwent magnetic resonance imaging which demonstrated asymmetric sublingual gland edema. The edema was located on the left sublingual gland in 2 children and was bilateral in the third. The symptoms continue to recur 25.5±3.3 months (range, 22.3–28.9) postoperatively and all are being managed conservatively. Chronic delayed onset intermittent sublingual edema is a possible long-term complication following neonatal MDO and further studies should explore the incidence and management of this finding.

show abstract

Case 29. Not All Sleep Studies Are the Same, Timing and Teaming Are Essential

Shah¹

2023

Sleepless and Sleepy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robin Sequence

Cited by 20 publications

References 74 publications

The etiology, clinical features, and treatment options of hemifacial microsomia

The etiology, clinical features, and treatment options of hemifacial microsomia

Delayed Sublingual Edema Following Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

Case 29. Not All Sleep Studies Are the Same, Timing and Teaming Are Essential

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About