2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8487987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-Aided Bimanual Assessment of Wrist Proprioception in People with Acute Stroke

Abstract: Proprioception the sense of body awareness is frequently impaired after stroke. Clinical tests used to detect proprioceptive impairments require substantial amounts of time and lack sensitivity. In contrast, robotic devices proprioceptive acuity. We here present results of a robot-aided bimanual test for wrist proprioception. Ten acute stroke patients with hemiplegic arm weakness and ten healthy subjects, participated to the experiment. Subjects actively moved the wrist of the unaffected limb to match the refe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plenty of examples of grounded, joint-space displays (GJS-KHD) can be found in literature, involving one or more fingers (Agarwal et al, 2015 ), wrist (Gupta et al 2008 ; Pehlivan et al 2012 ; Martinez et al 2013 ; Andrikopoulos et al 2015 ; Pezent et al 2017 ; Basteris et al 2018 ; Lee et al 2018 ; Pezent et al 2019 ), and full-arm (Frisoli et al, 2005 ; Gupta and O’Malley, 2006 ; Mallwitz et al, 2015 ; Barsotti et al, 2018 ). Several are also the wearable, joint-space solutions (WJS-KHD), in which is not present, and therefore all the weight of the structure has to be compensated by the user (the interface represented in Figure 1 would start from the contact point corresponding to the force ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plenty of examples of grounded, joint-space displays (GJS-KHD) can be found in literature, involving one or more fingers (Agarwal et al, 2015 ), wrist (Gupta et al 2008 ; Pehlivan et al 2012 ; Martinez et al 2013 ; Andrikopoulos et al 2015 ; Pezent et al 2017 ; Basteris et al 2018 ; Lee et al 2018 ; Pezent et al 2019 ), and full-arm (Frisoli et al, 2005 ; Gupta and O’Malley, 2006 ; Mallwitz et al, 2015 ; Barsotti et al, 2018 ). Several are also the wearable, joint-space solutions (WJS-KHD), in which is not present, and therefore all the weight of the structure has to be compensated by the user (the interface represented in Figure 1 would start from the contact point corresponding to the force ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel technologies for kinematic signal detection and processing provide the opportunity for an objective and accurate motion analysis, which allow to overcome the limitations of standard clinical assessments in stroke research and rehabilitation . Among the different approaches, it is worth mentioning (i) device-based assessments (Lambercy et al, 2013;Basteris et al, 2018), and (ii) less interfering wearable systems for bio-signal and motion capture processing (Camardella et al, 2018;Lorussi et al, 2016). However, although promising, the state-of-the-art solutions need to face with important issues, such as operator and patient safety and costs of the procedure (i).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%