2013
DOI: 10.1159/000346732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-Assisted Ramicotomy: Evaluation in a Swine Model

Abstract: Background: To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic T2-T5 ramicotomy. Methods: In 5 pigs, a robot-assisted thoracoscopic T2-T5 ramicotomy was performed, followed by T2-T5 sympathectomy 10 min later. Ramicotomy and sympathectomy times, and core (esophageal) and surface (left front foot) temperatures, were monitored and recorded. Results: The procedure was successfully completed in all 5 animals. In all cases, the sympathetic chain remained intact. No major hemorrhage occurred. The mean opera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They demonstrated that robotic ramicotomy is a successful technique with paramount hyperhidrosis relief and low compensated sweating rates (12). Consistently, in a porcine model, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic ramicotomy T2-T5 was shown to be an effective procedure, and the sympathetic chain was remained intact (13). Interestingly, T3 ramicotomy resulted in a lower rate of compensatory sweating compared to T3 sympathetic clipping, and there was no significant difference in the rate of satisfaction for palmar hyperhidrosis treatment (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…They demonstrated that robotic ramicotomy is a successful technique with paramount hyperhidrosis relief and low compensated sweating rates (12). Consistently, in a porcine model, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic ramicotomy T2-T5 was shown to be an effective procedure, and the sympathetic chain was remained intact (13). Interestingly, T3 ramicotomy resulted in a lower rate of compensatory sweating compared to T3 sympathetic clipping, and there was no significant difference in the rate of satisfaction for palmar hyperhidrosis treatment (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%