Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: Insights for a challenging surgical setting

Thomas, Dabreteau; Romain, Delangle; Henri, Azaïs; Phé, Véronique; Moawad, Gaby; Uzan, Catherine; Canlorbe, Geoffroy

doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102380

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a single-center study, robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy did not cause perioperative complications such as early bladder or bowel injury, indicating that it can help correct POP while minimizing the risk of complications from fibrosis or adhesion. The median operative time also showed no clear difference from the time for laparoscopic reconstruction [24,25]. Robotic sacrocolpopexy is a minimally invasive technique that is useful for POP patients.…”

Section: Sacrocolpopexymentioning

confidence: 89%

Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future

Park,

Bak,

Song

et al. 2023

Obstet Gynecol Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since its introduction, laparoscopic surgery has been often preferred over open surgery in obstetrics and gynecology due to its advantages, such as less bleeding, lower incidence of adhesions, reduced postoperative pain, short hospital stay, and quick return to daily life. However, in the case of complex surgeries, laparoscopy presented some limitations. Nonetheless, since the 1980s, medical robots have been introduced to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopy and start a new age for minimally invasive surgery. In this review, we explore the indications and advantages and disadvantages of robotic surgery in the field of gynecology, and try to assess the recent trend of robotic surgery.

show abstract

Section: Sacrocolpopexymentioning

confidence: 89%

Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future

Park,

Bak,

Song

et al. 2023

Obstet Gynecol Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…52 Although the operative duration with robot-assisted sacral colpopexy is longer, its reported advantages in comparison to the conventional laparoscopic approach include reduced postoperative blood loss and shorter inpatient stays. 53 Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy has been considered more effective than open myomectomy in terms of morbidity and overall recovery, with fertility outcomes comparable to both the open and conventional laparoscopic approach. 11,54,55 Chan et.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecology: An Evolving Assistive Technology

Xie,

Wood,

Dasgupta

et al. 2024

Surg Innov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Laparoscopic surgery is extensively utilized to treat a range of gynaecological conditions and pathologies. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery include the minimalization of blood loss and scarring, improved recovery times, and shorter hospital admissions. However, robotic technologies have had an increasing presence within gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in recent decades. This literature review therefore aims to discuss laparoscopy from 3 perspectives. First, the evolution of laparoscopy is reviewed with a focus on its origins, its transition from a diagnostic to an operative tool, and its role in present-day gynaecology. Second, interventions for benign gynaecological conditions (including excision of benign ovarian tumours, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and laparoscopic myomectomy) are reviewed. The laparoscopic management of malignant gynaecology (including ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and cervical cancer) is also discussed. Finally, whilst robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is experiencing rapid technological advancement, it is pertinent to consider the extent of its benefits when compared to open or conventional laparoscopic approaches in gynaecological surgery.

show abstract