2022
DOI: 10.1111/ases.13107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot‐assisted transperitoneal reconstruction of a retrocaval ureter: A report of two cases

Abstract: A retrocaval ureter (RCU) is a rare cause of congenital ureteral obstruction that often requires surgical repair. We report two cases of RCU in adults treated with robot‐assisted laparoscopic surgery. In both cases, we performed robotic ureteroureterostomy with dissection of the entire length of the retrocaval portion of the right ureter without complications. In the second case, renal stone removal was simultaneously performed. The robot‐assisted procedure we performed could be considered safe and feasible fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robotic technology provides several advantages, such as excellent 3D visualisation, enhanced manual dexterity, and a precise suturing technique. The first RAL approach for RCU was published in 2006 by Gundeti et al [3] in a paediatric patient, followed by several case reports or series [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, these studies have limited generalisability due to small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Robotic technology provides several advantages, such as excellent 3D visualisation, enhanced manual dexterity, and a precise suturing technique. The first RAL approach for RCU was published in 2006 by Gundeti et al [3] in a paediatric patient, followed by several case reports or series [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, these studies have limited generalisability due to small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first RAL approach for RCU was published in 2006 by Gundeti et al. [3] in a paediatric patient, followed by several case reports or series [6–12]. However, these studies have limited generalisability due to small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%