2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes

Abstract: The study aims to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis comparing radiological and functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using either robotic assistance or conventional methods from the latest assemblage of evidence. This study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. All studies in PubMed, EM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 4 Another recent meta-analysis did not reach a definitive conclusion about complications. 5 Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on patients who underwent UKA to compare the complication rates, revision rates and non-implant-specific complications between robotic-assisted and conventional UKA. We hypothesised that there would be no obvious differences in complication and revision rates between the two techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Another recent meta-analysis did not reach a definitive conclusion about complications. 5 Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on patients who underwent UKA to compare the complication rates, revision rates and non-implant-specific complications between robotic-assisted and conventional UKA. We hypothesised that there would be no obvious differences in complication and revision rates between the two techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be found that robotics had more accurate FTC alignment than the personalized 3D preoperative planning (Table II). Born for accurate alignment and prosthesis positioning, robotics has the advantages of intraoperative real-time navigation, secondary calibration and sensitive feedback [22][23][24], with the help of robotic arm and optical measurement technology. On the contrary, although there were multiple key points to reduce surgeons' subjective evaluation during intraoperative implementation in the 3D preoperative planning TKA [17], arthroplasty was still partly dependent on surgeons' observation and manual operation, which might result in inaccuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UKA survivorship is considered to be determined by limb alignment [8,10,15,16]. Nevertheless, it still remains controversial in the standard of correct limb alignment following UKA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%