Robot‐assisted vs ultrasonography‐guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block vs local anaesthesia in urology: results of the UROTAP randomized trial

Abstract

Objectives To prospectively analyse robotically administered transperitoneal transversus abdominis plane (robot‐assisted transversus abdominis plane [RTAP]) compared with both ultrasonography‐guided transversus abdominis plane (UTAP) and local anaesthesia (LA) with regard to pain control and narcotic use in patients undergoing robot‐assisted prostatectomy (RARP) or robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Subjects/Patients and Methods Patients undergoing RARP or RAPN were randomized in a single‐blind 2:2:1 fashion to RTAP:UTAP:LA, with the study powered to evaluate superiority of UTAP to LA and non‐inferiority of RTAP to UTAP. We compared time to deliver the block, operating room time, postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale, and intra‐operative and postoperative analgesia consumption. Results A total of 143 patients were randomized and received treatment. There was no significant difference in patient baseline characteristics. UTAP did not demonstrate superiority to LA in terms of pain control. RTAP and LA were faster to administer than UTAP (time to perform block 2.5 vs 2.5 vs 6.25 min; P < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative narcotic, acetaminophen, ketorolac or ondansetron requirements among the three groups (P > 0.05). The study was terminated early due to the unexpected efficacy of LA. Conclusion This study showed that UTAP and RTAP do not provide superior pain control to LA. The efficiency, effectiveness, and ease of administration of LA make it an excellent option for first‐line therapy for postoperative analgesia.