2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02556-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy—impact of a mentorship program on oncological outcomes during the learning curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the exclusion of surgical margins as an outcome measure due to conflicting data necessitates further investigation to elucidate their significance in RARP outcomes [29,30]. Additionally, we want to highlight that our surgeons did not follow a pre-set mentorship program; we recognize that a mentorship program can enhance learning curves and could result in better learning curves, as shown by some studies [23,31]. Lastly, according to the new 2024 guidelines, around 16% of the patients in the study would have been selected for active surveillance instead of immediate treatment because they fall into the ISUP 1 group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the exclusion of surgical margins as an outcome measure due to conflicting data necessitates further investigation to elucidate their significance in RARP outcomes [29,30]. Additionally, we want to highlight that our surgeons did not follow a pre-set mentorship program; we recognize that a mentorship program can enhance learning curves and could result in better learning curves, as shown by some studies [23,31]. Lastly, according to the new 2024 guidelines, around 16% of the patients in the study would have been selected for active surveillance instead of immediate treatment because they fall into the ISUP 1 group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Notably, the study of Chang et al acknowledged the positive impact of previous laparoscopic experience on both operative time and continence rates in prostatectomies [22]. In the same direction, Ryan et al [23] introduced the importance of a…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results were mostly based on surgical outcomes such as operation time, blood loss and specimen radicality. [33][34][35] Regarding oncological outcomes, several studies performed after the LACC trial suggest it would be safe to continue with minimally invasive surgery when performed by experienced (high-volume) surgeons. 36,37 However, these studies do not specify how the surgeons were trained, other than one study mentioning the surgeons were fellowship-trained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, many studies lack representativeness, as they typically examine the learning curves of one or a few surgeons [ 9 ]. The learning curve can vary significantly among individual surgeons due to factors such as prior training in other surgical modalities, operative experience in other procedures, and simulation or coaching, which can potentially shorten the learning curve [ 12 , 13 ]. Additionally, the frequency of performing a procedure (case cadence) may impact learning curves, an aspect not thoroughly examined in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%