Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade

Abstract

Background: Despite reports of increasing adoption of robotics in colorectal surgery worldwide, data regarding its uptake in Australasia are lacking. This study examines the trends of robotic colorectal surgery in Australia during the last 10 years. Methods: Data from patients undergoing robotic colorectal surgery with the da Vinci robotic platform between 2010 and 2019 were obtained. Overall, numbers of specific colorectal procedures across Australia were obtained from the Medicare Benefit Schedule data over the same period. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine the statistical trends of overall and specific robotic colorectal procedures over time. Results: A total of 6110 robotic general surgery procedures were performed across Australia during the study period. Of these, 3522 (57.6%) were robotic colorectal procedures. An increasing trend of overall robotic colorectal procedures was seen over 10 years (Pearson's coefficient of 0.875; P = 0.001). While this applied to both the public and private sectors, 90.7% of the procedures were undertaken in the private sector. Restorative rectal resections, rectopexies, and right hemicolectomies accounted for 82.6% of the robotic colorectal procedures performed during this period with an increasing trend seen over time for each intervention. Moreover, a robotic approach was utilized in 12.5%, 41.0% and 9.0% of all restorative rectal resections, rectopexies and right hemicolectomies undertaken in Australia during 2019, respectively. Conclusion: Robotic colorectal surgery has increased dramatically in Australia over the last 10 years, especially in the private sector. Penetration of robotic colorectal surgery in the public healthcare system will require focussed cost-benefit evaluations and governmental investment.

The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review

“…Questionnaires in seven simulation studies a preference for the robotic platform, which caused less frustration, physical discomfort and pain. This may improve performance, and has clearly influenced the ongoing growth in robotic colorectal surgery [1,3] which is largely driven by surgeon preference. The subjective sense that the robotic platform makes surgery easier may lead surgeons to perform more complex procedures using a robotic as opposed to a laparoscopic approach [34], with a preference for the robotic platform in the more challenging confines of the pelvis being well documented [1,3].…”

“…Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery confers the benefits of conventional laparoscopy, including smaller incisions, reduced pain, faster recovery and reduced intra-abdominal adhesions. Benefits specific to robotic surgery include three-dimensional (3D) views, wristed instruments and better ergonomics for the surgeon [1]. While clinical outcomes generally seem to be equivalent to laparoscopy [2], the robotic platform requires significant initial and ongoing costs, with longer operating times in most studies.…”

How to do a Delorme's sleeve mucosectomy and muscular plication for full‐thickness rectal prolapse

“…Surgery is the only definitive treatment option for rectal prolapse and but there is no single, accepted standard procedure 1–3 . Minimally invasive trans‐abdominal surgery, such as ventral rectopexy using synthetic or biologic grafts and resection rectopexy, have become widespread in this modern era, 4–6 and perineal approaches, such as the Altmeier's and Delorme's procedures, are generally offered to frail patients who are unable to tolerate pneumoperitoneum.…”

Operative and oncological outcomes after robotic rectal resection compared with laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…[3][4][5] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery enables magnified, threedimensional views and wristed instruments which promise to facilitate pelvic surgery, theoretically improving the quality of the dissection. This has spurred uptake of the platform for rectal cancer, 6 despite ongoing questions regarding the cost-benefits. Most studies show outcomes after robotic rectal resections to be equivalent, but not necessarily better than laparoscopy, with additional costs and longer operating times.…”