1994
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90132-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic fault detection and fault tolerance: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
92
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in [10] and [12] we can find compilations of some developments in fault diagnosis. Through analysis of these works, it becomes evident that some techniques are not feasible for integration in mobile robots or that their full application can become impractical, either because of high amounts of processing power or because they are valid during design only.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both in [10] and [12] we can find compilations of some developments in fault diagnosis. Through analysis of these works, it becomes evident that some techniques are not feasible for integration in mobile robots or that their full application can become impractical, either because of high amounts of processing power or because they are valid during design only.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is noted that the special characteristics encountered on the robotics field, like limited available redundancy, increase the hardship in designing new methods for fault detection. It is also mentioned that, because of the imperfection of sensors, thresholds should be used, preferably dynamic, in order to avoid false positive detections [12]. Despite the problems concerning model-based methods, in recent years, it remained an important base for works in the field, including the development of a technique that aimed to overcome a deficiency found in most approaches, as most only consider the occurrence of isolated faults (one fault in one component) and fail to address simultaneous faults or, in alternative, require sensor redundancy to detect these situations.…”
Section: Industrial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The first question that arises in the study of convergence behaviors of a failed manipulator is whether the desired task position is reachable, that is, lies within the postfeilure workspace. If indeed it does, the issue of whether, under the employed control scheme, the manipulator converges correctly to the desired position must be examined.…”
Section: • Journal Of Robotic Systems-200smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case when the sensor has indeed ties 'Ia equal the commanded velocities 'Ic' However, in the event of a locked-joint failure of the ith joint, the corresponding element of ' Ia is identically zero. Then, the actual end-effector velocity is given by (3) where iJ is the post-failure Jacobian, given by…”
Section: • Journal Of Robotic Systems-200smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this work has centered on incorporation of redundant [4±6] and backup systems. The extra components needed for fault tolerant robot designs obviously add extra costs and extra possibilities of failure [7,8]. Reliability analysis tools such as fault trees [9±11] and Markov [12±14] models give hard numbers showing that the bene®ts of the fault tolerant design are tangible and worth the effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%