2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02611-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study on End-Effectors and Neurophysiological Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-three (33) athletes met these criteria and were recruited for the study. The sample size was a convenience one, but it was in line with previous studies concerning biofeedback and robotic interventions [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Moreover, G. Power post hoc calculations for the ANOVA that was performed indicated a statistical power of 96%, provided a minimum effect size of 0.3 (as given by eta square).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty-three (33) athletes met these criteria and were recruited for the study. The sample size was a convenience one, but it was in line with previous studies concerning biofeedback and robotic interventions [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Moreover, G. Power post hoc calculations for the ANOVA that was performed indicated a statistical power of 96%, provided a minimum effect size of 0.3 (as given by eta square).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this sense, sEMG could represent a great opportunity to refine the assessments available to rehabilitators. It is a safe and valid tool that is potentially capable of improving and accelerating the results of rehabilitation treatments, since it guarantees the real-time monitoring of muscle activity and joint range of motion [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, some studies have underlined the importance of robotic training (especially when coupled to virtual reality) in boosting both motor and cognitive outcomes and processing speed, with a positive perception of patients' performance, as compared to traditional training [5,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we included 30 adults admitted to the inpatient neurological rehabilitation unit. The sample size was decided based on previous pilot studies concerning biofeedback and/or robotic interventions [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Each participant was recruited with informed consent to participate in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%