Robotic single-site cholecystectomy in the obese: outcomes from a single institution

Svoboda, Shane; Qaqish, T. Robert; Wilson, Ana; Park, Habeeba; Youssef, Yassar

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.016

Cited by 24 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In light of these findings, obesity seems represent a good indication for robotically assisted surgery [4,5,8]. However, to date, only few studies have analyzed the single-site robotic approach in obese patients [9,10].…”

Section: Replymentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic Single-Site Surgery in Management of Obese Patients With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Bogliolo¹,

Cassani²,

Musacchi³

et al. 2015

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Replymentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic Single-Site Surgery in Management of Obese Patients With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Bogliolo¹,

Cassani²,

Musacchi³

et al. 2015

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Robotic cholecystectomy (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] With the current platform available, two major approaches are used: single site and multi-port. We reviewed the current literature and found 2,039 cases listed in the time frame we choose.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic surgery for liver, pancreas, and bile duct pathologies: A critical analysis and personal views

Matteotti

2019

Gastrointestinal Intervention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the beginning of this millennium robotic surgery was launched and quickly became accepted in many surgical specialties. Initially only resection procedures were performed with a few surgical steps made towards reconstructive elements. Robotic surgery helped to overcome disadvantages seen and experienced when performing laparoscopic procedures, mainly lack of haptic feedback, lack of 'free movement' in the abdominal cavity and inferior visualization. Since its initiation, robotic surgery was utilized more and more in complex procedures. Its use in complex liver and pancreatic surgery is still controversial as it requires a high volume center and superb training to achieve acceptable results. Robotic surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary disease is only performed by a few centers in the United States. A team approach is mandatory and the bed side assistant is as important as the console surgeon in achieving acceptable oncological outcome. This article aims to review the most recent literature and gives some personal views into the near future with anticipated development of this exciting technology.

show abstract

“…Also in the latter study, almost a third of the patients had BMI ≥ 30 kg m −2 and some patients even had ASA IV (1.3%). The feasibility of this technique in obese patients has been demonstrated by the study of Svoboda et al . Furthermore, a history of previous abdominal surgeries is compatible with this robotic approach because nearly 48% of patients had a history of abdominal surgery …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Single‐incision robotic cholecystectomy is associated with a high rate of trocar‐site infection

Lim

Nassif

Lahat

et al. 2017

Robotics Computer Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Robotic single-site cholecystectomy in the obese: outcomes from a single institution

Cited by 24 publications

References 24 publications

Robotic Single-Site Surgery in Management of Obese Patients With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Robotic Single-Site Surgery in Management of Obese Patients With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Robotic surgery for liver, pancreas, and bile duct pathologies: A critical analysis and personal views

Single‐incision robotic cholecystectomy is associated with a high rate of trocar‐site infection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About