2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43154-021-00072-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Systems in Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery

Abstract: Purpose of Review This review provides an overview of robotic systems in radiotherapy and radiosurgery, with a focus on medical devices and recently proposed research systems. We summarize the key motivation for using robotic systems and illustrate the potential advantages. Recent Findings. Robotic systems have been proposed for a variety of tasks in radiotherapy, including the positioning of beam source, patients, and imaging devices. A number of systems … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These components are interconnected through a robust and efficient network, ensuring seamless communication and coordination. This integration of state-of-the-art components forms the backbone of our system, enabling it to meet the stringent demands of precision and reliability required in its application [12]. Figure 7 shows the axes numbering and the network connection of the PPS Subsystem Motion Controller and Drives.…”
Section: Design Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These components are interconnected through a robust and efficient network, ensuring seamless communication and coordination. This integration of state-of-the-art components forms the backbone of our system, enabling it to meet the stringent demands of precision and reliability required in its application [12]. Figure 7 shows the axes numbering and the network connection of the PPS Subsystem Motion Controller and Drives.…”
Section: Design Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most preclinical FLASH studies have been performed using electrons ( Table 2 ), the results of such experiments are being extrapolated to photons, protons, and other types of radiation (e.g., carbon ions), for which there is emerging preclinical data [ 46 , 68 , 69 ]. The low penetration depth of electron beams is adequate for preclinical studies and the treatment of superficial tumors/surfaces in the clinic (e.g., skin metastases, intra-operative treatments), and machines are being developed for these clinical indications, including FLASHKNiFE [ 70 , 71 ], IntraOp Mobetron [ 72 ], and modified NOVAC7 [ 73 ]. Electron FLASH has already been used in the clinic, and trials have been initiated.…”
Section: Towards the Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly innovative topic of robot assisted (Gerlach and Schläfer 2022) and image guided interventions (Unger et al 2021) includes robot assisted US imaging (Priester et al 2013, von Haxthausen et al 2021 and is focused on developments in a variety of scenarios, including long term motion monitoring (Ipsen et al 2021) to scanning applications (Aalamifar et al 2016, Seitz et al 2020, Abbas et al 2021, Chen et al 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some additional semi-autonomous positioning strategy were presented by Conti et al (2014), Seitz et al (2020), Ipsen et al (2021), which moves the robot arm above the desired position and uses a game controller for remote control of the final lowering of the probe to patient's skin. Some comparisons can be found in the literaturWestern et al (2015), von Haxthausen et al (2021), Gerlach and Schläfer (2022). These methods may be feasible for experimental setups but are potentially impracticable for clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%