2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5433-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: RT is as safe as OT for the treatment of thyroid cancer. Based on the long-time follow-up and surgical completeness, the adverse events and complications, and recurrence rate of RT were comparable with OT. RT was associated with a significantly lesser blood loss, smaller number of retrieved lymph nodes, a lower level of swallowing impairment, and better cosmetic satisfaction. In contrast, OT was associated with shorter operation time, smaller total drain amount, and lower postoperative serum Tg level. Overall,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
75
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“… 6 , 7 Both transaxillary and retroauricular techniques are safe surgical options and provide better cosmetic outcomes by avoiding a visible central neck incision. A systematic review by Pan et al 8 also found that robotic thyroidectomy had less blood loss and a lower level of swallowing impairment when compared to open thyroidectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“… 6 , 7 Both transaxillary and retroauricular techniques are safe surgical options and provide better cosmetic outcomes by avoiding a visible central neck incision. A systematic review by Pan et al 8 also found that robotic thyroidectomy had less blood loss and a lower level of swallowing impairment when compared to open thyroidectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite all progress, the financial commitment and time sacrifice are the major limitations for a broad implementation of robotic thyroidectomy into daily routine. Despite our promising operative results, an expanded population from careful selection of eligible patients is mandatory, and future prospective trials should be conducted to evaluate long-term outcomes and to overcome potential limitations [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been published regarding the safety and efficiency of robotic thyroidectomy. Those reviews relied mainly on Korean publications [13-15] showing that robotic thyroidectomy was as safe as OpenT for benign and cancer cases, with the same rate of complications, but a longer operative time. In our study, morbidity with TARS appears comparable to OpenT since the percentage of postoperative complications, such as hypoparathyroidism or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, is similar to those reported in several meta-analyses [7, 10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons is that most of the nodules in Korean publications are smaller than our series (largest diameter of around 10 mm vs. 20 mm in our series). American [15] and Chinese [13] meta-analyses of Korean articles showed that the postoperative Tg level after TARS was significantly higher than after openT, but the interpretation remains difficult because some patients had only lobectomy, the condition and the time of postoperative Tg dosage were not specified, and the use of RAI was not specified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%