2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
1
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
83
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…A CO 2 laser is not required but may facilitate and speed up surgery. There is no evidence today that robotic surgery is an advantage (41,42).…”
Section: Discoid Excisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CO 2 laser is not required but may facilitate and speed up surgery. There is no evidence today that robotic surgery is an advantage (41,42).…”
Section: Discoid Excisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robot-assisted approaches had reportedly been used for endometriosis surgery [47], Siesto in the largest series published regarding robot-assisted surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis concluded robot-assisted surgery is a safe and attractive alternative to accomplish a comprehensive surgical treatment especially when bowel or bladder resections are required [48].…”
Section: General Gynecology: Endometriosis Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no signi fi cant differences between these groups in blood loss, hospitalization, or complications, but the mean operative time with the robot was 191 min (135-295) compared with 159 min (85-320) during standard laparoscopy. Since both treatments have excellent outcomes and the robotic technique required a longer operative time, it was concluded that the robot has no added value for the treatment of early stage endometriosis [ 36 ] .…”
Section: Robotically Assisted Resection Of Endometriosismentioning
confidence: 99%