1993
DOI: 10.1006/jaer.1993.1020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotics of Fruit Harvesting: A State-of-the-art Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other automated solutions studied for specific cultural operations are represented by the work of (Tillet & Hague, 1999) for the automatic hoe control; the works of (Tillet et al, 2002;Åstrand & Baerveldt, 2002) for the inter-row raking and tilling for weed control in sugar beet; the works of Tian et al (1999), Paice et al (1995), Tillet et al (1998) for precision spraying devoted to weed control and crop treatment; the work of Blasco et al (2002) for weed control implemented with electrical discharges. Final fields of study for automated applications in the field are represented by robotic solutions for harvesting, as illustrated by the works of Monta et al (1995), Sarig (1993), Sanders (2005) and Peterson et al (1999), and mapping yield and fruit quality (Quiao et al, 2005). It is worth noting that most studies in literature deal with one specific agricultural operation for which automated solutions are studied and presented.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Robotic Studies In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other automated solutions studied for specific cultural operations are represented by the work of (Tillet & Hague, 1999) for the automatic hoe control; the works of (Tillet et al, 2002;Åstrand & Baerveldt, 2002) for the inter-row raking and tilling for weed control in sugar beet; the works of Tian et al (1999), Paice et al (1995), Tillet et al (1998) for precision spraying devoted to weed control and crop treatment; the work of Blasco et al (2002) for weed control implemented with electrical discharges. Final fields of study for automated applications in the field are represented by robotic solutions for harvesting, as illustrated by the works of Monta et al (1995), Sarig (1993), Sanders (2005) and Peterson et al (1999), and mapping yield and fruit quality (Quiao et al, 2005). It is worth noting that most studies in literature deal with one specific agricultural operation for which automated solutions are studied and presented.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Robotic Studies In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robotics has limitations in P&P operations due to the difficulty in achieving gripper solutions capable of manipulating fragile and heterogeneous fresh fruit and vegetables. Sarig (1993) reviewed state-of-the-art of robotics in harvesting, pointing out the necessities to optimize R&D work required for the realization of robotic harvesting. Achievements in fruit and vegetable handling have been found in picking harvesting systems for products such as: strawberries (Hayashi et al, 2010), cucumbers (Van Henten et al, 2009), tomatoes (Monta et al, 1998a,b;Ceccarelli et al, 2000), aubergines (Hayashi et al, 2002), apples (Setiawan et al, 2004), chicories (Foglia and Reina, 2006), and oranges (Muscato et al, 2005).…”
Section: Product Manipulation and Physical Properties Of Horticulturamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this unfortunate outcome cannot be blamed solely on the failure of machine vision to handle the challenges posed by the unconstrained and unstructured agricultural environment, it is undeniable that successful machine vision is critical for achieving high detection rates of ripe fruit in real time. The challenge of developing a cost-effective robotic system for fruit picking has been taken up by researchers at several places in the world [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%