2015
DOI: 10.1080/10714413.2015.1091258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robots Teaching Other Little Robots: Neoliberalism, CCSS, and Teacher Professionalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who develop curricula for such diverse populations as those in Australian classroom are ethically required to challenge the legacy of 'Tylerism' (Tyler, 1949) and the impact that this economy based model of teaching and learning and its subsequent variations (see New South Wales Department of Education and Training, 2003;Newmann & Associates, 1996;Wiggins & Mc Tighe, 2005;Wiggins & McTighe, 2007), has had on Australian curriculum development and implementation as a direct result of both Tyler's (1949) original model and the neoliberal agenda which has impacted heavily on educational systems in Australia in much the same way as it has in other "western ' countries (de Lissovey, 2013;de Lissovy, 2015;Endcott et al, 2015;Saltman, 2003;Saltman & Means). As a result, education in Australia is currently characterised by constant competition, provision of public education as a so called 'even playing field' dominated by explicit teaching, an increasing focus on predetermined learning outcomes and the abandonment of the 'losers' in these educational battlefields as unproductive and unnecessary in society.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who develop curricula for such diverse populations as those in Australian classroom are ethically required to challenge the legacy of 'Tylerism' (Tyler, 1949) and the impact that this economy based model of teaching and learning and its subsequent variations (see New South Wales Department of Education and Training, 2003;Newmann & Associates, 1996;Wiggins & Mc Tighe, 2005;Wiggins & McTighe, 2007), has had on Australian curriculum development and implementation as a direct result of both Tyler's (1949) original model and the neoliberal agenda which has impacted heavily on educational systems in Australia in much the same way as it has in other "western ' countries (de Lissovey, 2013;de Lissovy, 2015;Endcott et al, 2015;Saltman, 2003;Saltman & Means). As a result, education in Australia is currently characterised by constant competition, provision of public education as a so called 'even playing field' dominated by explicit teaching, an increasing focus on predetermined learning outcomes and the abandonment of the 'losers' in these educational battlefields as unproductive and unnecessary in society.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This national standards initiative outlines expectations for what students should learn in each grade level. This collection period is potentially relevant because CCSS introduced considerable uncertainty in K‐12 education and motivated educators and administrators to understand how the standards applied to their curricula, teaching styles, and students (Endacott et al 2015). Organizational uncertainty increases information processing and sense‐making demands, and consequently can increase the likelihood and usefulness of interpersonal interactions (Hambrick and Finkelstein 1987).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, struggling schools serving disadvantaged communities often have greater constraints to their autonomy (Klein, 2017). These constraints are intended to force a 'correction' to the school's practices, but they often exacerbate the problems experienced by the staff and students (Endacott et al 2015). Effective professional growth, and sustainable best practice, must come by building a space for educators to experience autonomy.…”
Section: Collaborative Practicementioning
confidence: 99%